CorneaJanuary 2026Journal Article

Characteristics and Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for Treatment of Failed Endothelial Keratoplasty.

Glaucoma Surgery

Summary

DMEK for failed EK provided rapid visual rehabilitation with low risk of rejection.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for failed endothelial keratoplasty (EK).

METHODS

We reviewed 362 consecutive DMEK cases for failed EK (Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) or DMEK), 118 for early EK failure, and 244 for late failure in 333 eyes of 323 patients without penetrating keratoplasty. Rejection and graft survival rates were assessed with Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 85% of cases had 1 prior EK and 15% had 2 to 5. The rate of medically or surgically managed glaucoma was 21% in eyes with 1 failed EK, 51% in eyes with 2, and 80% in eyes with ≥3, P <0.0001. The mean postoperative corrected visual acuity was 20/25 ± 1 line at 1 and 5 years in eyes without vision-limiting comorbidity. The 5-year rejection episode rate was 4%. One- and 5-year survival rates of DMEK regrafts for early failure of an initial EK were 98% and 94%, respectively. One- and 5-year survival rates among all cases of DMEK for EK failure were 96% and 91% in eyes not treated for glaucoma preoperatively, 88% and 81% in eyes with medically managed glaucoma, and 88% and 30% in eyes with a trabeculectomy or tube shunt.

CONCLUSIONS

DMEK for failed EK provided rapid visual rehabilitation with low risk of rejection. Graft survival was associated with glaucoma status and original indication for keratoplasty, with Fuchs dystrophy having the most favorable prognosis. Survival rates were highest in eyes treated for early failure of an initial EK.

Keywords

DSAEKDescemet membrane endothelial keratoplastyDescemet stripping endothelial keratoplastyFuchs dystrophybullous keratopathyendothelial cell lossendotheliitisglaucomagraft survivaliridocorneal endothelial syndromesecondary corneal edema

In the Knowledge Library

Discussion

Comments and discussion will appear here in a future update.