Real-world characteristics and safety outcomes of 10 000 eyes treated with intracanalicular dexamethasone insert: IRIS registry analysis 2019 to 2021.
Srilatha Vantipalli, Michael Mbagwu, Robert T Chang, Sonya Li, Dina Akasheh, Matthew W Cheung, Rabia Gurses-Ozden, Michael H Goldstein
Summary
The DEX insert was found to have comparable inflammation, lacrimal disorder, and IOP outcomes to alternate perioperative therapy after cataract surgery, and real-world safety outcomes in this cohort of more than 10,000 eyes were similar to those observed in prior DEX clinical trials.
Abstract
PURPOSE
To characterize real-world patient profiles and safety-related diagnoses from the first 10 000 eyes receiving the dexamethasone intracanalicular (DEX) insert indicated for the treatment of ocular inflammation and pain after ophthalmic surgery.
SETTING
American Academy of Ophthalmology Intelligent Research in Sight Registry.
DESIGN
Retrospective cohort study of electronic health records.
METHODS
All eyes that received DEX 2 days before or up to 7 days after cataract surgery (DEX+ group) between June 1, 2019 (start of commercialization), and March 31, 2021, were identified by procedure coding. A control cohort of eyes not receiving DEX (DEX- group) was drawn from the same practices as DEX+ eyes. Outcomes included characterization of demographics, comorbidities, and safety events of interest.
RESULTS
10 313 DEX+ and 425 098 DEX- eyes were analyzed of 3 703 177 eyes undergoing cataract procedures during the index period. Eyes with a history of coded conditions relating to ocular surface disease (OSD) received DEX at a higher rate than eyes without a history of OSD (n = 3311 [32.1%] vs n = 104 205 [24.5%], P < .0001), and approximately one-quarter of eyes in both cohorts had preexisting glaucoma (n = 2634 and n = 105 700 eyes, respectively). Postoperative inflammatory events, corneal edema, and lacrimal disorders were uncommon (<2%) and had a comparable incidence in both cohorts. In DEX+ and DEX- eyes, the incidence of cystoid macular edema (n = 130, 1.3% and n = 2673, 0.6%, respectively, P < .0001) and epiphora (n = 73, 0.7% and n = 899, 0.2%, respectively, P < .0001) was low. DEX+ and DEX- cohorts had comparable incidence of intraocular pressure (IOP) elevations ≥10 mm Hg and similar mean IOP changes through postoperative month 1.
CONCLUSIONS
The DEX insert was found to have comparable inflammation, lacrimal disorder, and IOP outcomes with alternate perioperative therapy after cataract surgery, and real-world safety outcomes in this cohort of more than 10 000 eyes were similar to those observed in prior DEX clinical trials. The DEX intracanalicular insert may be considered as a suitable alternative treatment option to topical anti-inflammatory drops in patients undergoing cataract surgery.
Top Research in IOP & Medical Therapy
Browse all →The Complications of Myopia: A Review and Meta-Analysis.
Inflammation in Glaucoma: From the back to the front of the eye, and beyond.
Treatment Outcomes in the Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study after 1 Year of Follow-up.
In the Knowledge Library
Discussion
Comments and discussion will appear here in a future update.