Intraocular Pressure Measurement Variability Associated With Face Mask Use.
Ortal Fogel Tempelhof, Yael Reich, Rony Rachmiel, Ori Berliner, Michael Waisbourd, Shimon Kurtz
Summary
Face masks inconsistently alter intraocular pressure measurements, reaching clinical significance in one-third of patients. Clinicians should consider repeated measurements without a mask or using other tonometers before making treatment decisions.
Abstract
PRCIS
Masks have a multi-factorial impact on intraocular pressure measured with the Goldmann tonometer, reaching clinical significance in one-third of patients. Before making clinical decisions, repeated measurements without a mask or other tonometers should be considered.
PURPOSE
To investigate the impact of wearing face masks on intraocular pressure (IOP), the only manageable factor today in glaucoma, a blinding disease. Given the recurrent global outbreaks of respiratory infections (e.g., COVID-19, RSV, and measles), mask use remains a crucial measure to reduce transmission.
METHODS
A prospective, randomized, controlled, and blinded clinical study. Adult patients without corneal pathologies or hypotony were recruited in the glaucoma clinic. Each patient underwent IOP measurements using the Goldmann applanation tonometer under three conditions: with a surgical mask, KN95 mask and without a mask as the control.
RESULTS
47 patients (94 eyes) with various types of glaucoma, were enrolled. Past ocular history included an average of IOP-lowering medications of 1.7±1.5 (range 0 to 5), 25.5% had prior laser treatment for IOP control, and 19.1% had previously undergone glaucoma surgery. The mean difference in IOP readings between the masks ranged from 0 to 7.5 mm Hg with no statistical significance, P=0.116. No significant differences were found based on gender (P=0.560), laterality (P=0.384), number of IOP-lowering medications (P=0.730), history of previous glaucoma laser treatment (P=0.456), or surgery (P=0.425). Sixteen patients (34.0%) exhibited an IOP difference of 3 mm Hg or more between the conditions, although not statistically significant (P=0.546).
CONCLUSION
Masks exert inconsistent effects on IOP measurements. In approximately one-third of patients the differences reached clinical significance, although not statistically significant. These variations are presumably influenced by multiple factors, such as mask fit to facial structure, positioning, and alterations in breathing patterns while wearing masks.
Keywords
Top Research in IOP & Medical Therapy
Browse all →The Complications of Myopia: A Review and Meta-Analysis.
Inflammation in Glaucoma: From the back to the front of the eye, and beyond.
Treatment Outcomes in the Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study after 1 Year of Follow-up.
Discussion
Comments and discussion will appear here in a future update.