Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

OphthalmologyFebruary 200453 citations

Variable corneal compensation improves discrimination between normal and glaucomatous eyes with the scanning laser polarimeter.

Tannenbaum Dana P, Hoffman Douglas, Lemij Hans G, Garway-Heath David F, Greenfield David S, Caprioli Joseph


AI Summary

A study found that a scanning laser polarimeter with a variable corneal compensator (VCC) significantly improved glaucoma detection, including early cases, by better accounting for individual corneal differences.

Abstract

Purpose

The presently available scanning laser polarimeter (SLP) has a fixed corneal compensator (FCC) that neutralizes corneal birefringence only in eyes with birefringence that matches the population mode. A prototype variable corneal compensator (VCC) provides neutralization of individual corneal birefringence based on individual macular retardation patterns. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative ability of the SLP with the FCC and with the VCC to discriminate between normal and glaucomatous eyes.

Design

Prospective, nonrandomized, comparative case series.

Participants

Algorithm-generating set consisting of 56 normal eyes and 55 glaucomatous eyes and an independent data set consisting of 83 normal eyes and 56 glaucomatous eyes.

Testing: Sixteen retardation measurements were obtained with the SLP with the FCC and the VCC from all subjects.

Main outcome measures

Dependency of parameters on age, gender, ethnic origin, and eye side was sought. Logistic regression was used to evaluate how well the various parameters could detect glaucoma. Discriminant functions were generated, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was determined.

Results

Discrimination between normal and glaucomatous eyes on the basis of single parameters was significantly better with the VCC than with the FCC for 6 retardation parameters: nasal average (P = 0.0003), superior maximum (P = 0.0003), ellipse average (P = 0.002), average thickness (P = 0.003), superior average (P = 0.010), and inferior average (P = 0.010). Discriminant analysis identified the optimal combination of parameters for the FCC and for the VCC. When the discriminant functions were applied to the independent data set, areas under the ROC curve were 0.84 for the FCC and 0.90 for the VCC (P<0.021). When the discriminant functions were applied to a subset of patients with early visual field loss, areas under the ROC curve were 0.82 for the FCC and 0.90 for the VCC (P<0.016).

Conclusion

Individual correction for corneal birefringence with the VCC significantly improved the ability of the SLP to distinguish between normal and glaucomatous eyes and enabled detection of patients with early glaucoma.


MeSH Terms

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsBirefringenceCorneaDiagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalDiscriminant AnalysisFalse Negative ReactionsFemaleGlaucomaHumansIntraocular PressureLasersMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesROC CurveReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityVisual Fields

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.