Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

Graefes Arch Clin Exp OphthalmolAugust 200913 citations

Optic nerve head topography in nonglaucomatous, normotensive patients with unilateral exfoliation syndrome.

Puska Päivi, Harju Mika


AI Summary

This study found that unilateral exfoliation syndrome alone, without elevated or fluctuating IOP, does not cause optic nerve damage, suggesting IOP is key in EXS-related glaucoma.

Abstract

Background

Optic nerve head damage may result from high intraocular pressure (IOP) associated with the exfoliation syndrome (EXS). At equal IOP levels, eyes with EXS may suffer damage more easily than eyes without EXS. Opinion differs as to whether EXS alone, without the contributory effect of a raised IOP, is a risk factor for optic nerve head damage.

Methods

36 nonglaucomatous, normotensive patients (mean age 68.4 +/- 7.1 years) with unilateral EXS were examined for optic disc topography with confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph). The only patients included were those with an IOP difference of < or =3 mmHg between fellow eyes and with IOP fluctuation < or =5 mmHg in diurnal curves.

Results

Mean IOP was higher in the EXS than in the fellow non-EXS eyes (15.0 +/- 2.8 vs 14.1 +/- 2.7 mmHg, P < 0.001). According to the multivariate analysis of variance, no differences existed in the global parameters between EXS and non-EXS eyes (P = 0.778). Nor did differences appear in sectoral parameters between fellow eyes in the temporal (P = 0.634), temporal superior (P = 0.236), temporal inferior (P = 0.330), nasal (P = 0.711), nasal superior (P = 0.307), and nasal inferior (P = 0.434) sectors.

Conclusion

EXS may not in itself be a risk factor for optic disc damage when IOP is not elevated from its base level, and when its variation is normal.


MeSH Terms

AgedExfoliation SyndromeFemaleGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedOphthalmoscopyOptic DiskOptic Nerve DiseasesRisk FactorsTonometry, Ocular

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.