Effect of corneal morphometry on dynamic contour and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Saenz-Frances Federico, Jañez Luis, Borrego-Sanz Lara, Martinez-de-la-Casa Jose Maria, Jerez-Fidalgo Maria, Garcia-Sánchez Julian, Garcia-Feijoo Julian
AI Summary
This study found Goldmann tonometry (GAT) is influenced by central corneal thickness and multiple central corneal zones, whereas dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) is less affected, primarily by one central zone. This suggests DCT may offer more accurate intraocular pressure measurements.
Abstract
Objectives
To determine the effects on dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) of the power of the flattest and steepest corneal meridians, their orientation, central corneal thickness (CCT), mean overall corneal thickness, and the mean thickness of a circular zone centered at the corneal apex of 1 mm radius (zone I) and the mean thicknesses of several concentric rings also centered at the apex of width 1 mm (zones II to VI, respectively).
Methods
A total of 136 consecutive healthy eyes were examined. Two multivariate linear regression models were constructed, 1 for each tonometry system. In both models, the predictive variables were: keratometric power of the flattest and steepest axes, flattest axis (as one of the categories 0 to 30, 30 to 60, 60 to 90, 90 to 120, 120 to 150, and 150 to 180 degrees), CCT, mean overall corneal thickness (determined using the Pentacam), and mean thicknesses of corneal zones I, II, III, IV, V, and VI (determined using the Pentacam).
Results
The multivariate regression analysis (adjusted R=0.11; P=0.04) revealed that GAT was influenced by CCT [B=0.042; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.002-0.085] and the mean thicknesses of zones I (B=0.996; 95% CI, 0.105-1.729), II (B=-1.688; 95% CI, -3.171 to -0.204), and III (B=0.718; 95% CI, 0.028-1.407), whereas DCT was solely affected by the mean thickness of zone II (B=-0.372; 95% CI, -0.728 to -0.016) (adjusted R2=0.13; P=0.02).
Conclusions
Although DCT is only affected by the mean thickness of zone II, GAT is influenced by CCT and the mean thickness of zones I, II, and III.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Related Articles5
Development and Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence Model to Set Target IOP for Glaucoma.
Observational StudyThe relationship between intraocular pressure and glaucoma: An evolving concept.
ReviewLong-term Safety and Performance of a Suprachoroidal Pressure Sensor System: Results of the EYEMATE-SC Trial Follow-up Study.
Clinical TrialGlaucoma Home Self-Testing Using VR Visual Fields and Rebound Tonometry Versus In-Clinic Perimetry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: A Pilot Study.
Clinical TrialCorneal biomechanical changes in patients with anterior chamber inflammation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Systematic ReviewIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.