Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

J GlaucomaMay 20134 citations

Effect of corneal morphometry on dynamic contour and Goldmann applanation tonometry.

Saenz-Frances Federico, Jañez Luis, Borrego-Sanz Lara, Martinez-de-la-Casa Jose Maria, Jerez-Fidalgo Maria, Garcia-Sánchez Julian, Garcia-Feijoo Julian


AI Summary

This study found Goldmann tonometry (GAT) is influenced by central corneal thickness and multiple central corneal zones, whereas dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) is less affected, primarily by one central zone. This suggests DCT may offer more accurate intraocular pressure measurements.

Abstract

Objectives

To determine the effects on dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) of the power of the flattest and steepest corneal meridians, their orientation, central corneal thickness (CCT), mean overall corneal thickness, and the mean thickness of a circular zone centered at the corneal apex of 1 mm radius (zone I) and the mean thicknesses of several concentric rings also centered at the apex of width 1 mm (zones II to VI, respectively).

Methods

A total of 136 consecutive healthy eyes were examined. Two multivariate linear regression models were constructed, 1 for each tonometry system. In both models, the predictive variables were: keratometric power of the flattest and steepest axes, flattest axis (as one of the categories 0 to 30, 30 to 60, 60 to 90, 90 to 120, 120 to 150, and 150 to 180 degrees), CCT, mean overall corneal thickness (determined using the Pentacam), and mean thicknesses of corneal zones I, II, III, IV, V, and VI (determined using the Pentacam).

Results

The multivariate regression analysis (adjusted R=0.11; P=0.04) revealed that GAT was influenced by CCT [B=0.042; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.002-0.085] and the mean thicknesses of zones I (B=0.996; 95% CI, 0.105-1.729), II (B=-1.688; 95% CI, -3.171 to -0.204), and III (B=0.718; 95% CI, 0.028-1.407), whereas DCT was solely affected by the mean thickness of zone II (B=-0.372; 95% CI, -0.728 to -0.016) (adjusted R2=0.13; P=0.02).

Conclusions

Although DCT is only affected by the mean thickness of zone II, GAT is influenced by CCT and the mean thickness of zones I, II, and III.


MeSH Terms

CorneaCorneal PachymetryCross-Sectional StudiesHumansIntraocular PressureReference ValuesRegression AnalysisTonometry, Ocular

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.