COMPARISON OF ANTERIOR SEGMENT OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY PARAMETERS BETWEEN CENTRAL RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION AND NORMAL EYES: Is Primary Angle Closure a Risk Factor for Central Retinal Vein Occlusion?
Mohammadi Massood, Bazvand Fatemeh, Makateb Ali, Eslami Yadollah, Jabbarvand Behrooz Mahmood, Fakhraie Ghasem, Zarei Reza, Moghimi Sasan
AI Summary
This study found CRVO patients have shallower anterior chambers and narrower angles bilaterally, suggesting narrow angles may be a risk factor for CRVO development.
Abstract
Purpose
To compare anterior segment parameters in patients with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) with normal control subjects by anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT).
Methods
In this coss-sectional case-control study, 42 eyes from 21 patients with unilateral CRVO and 21 eyes from 21 age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects were recruited. Study eyes were divided into three groups: involved eyes of CRVO patients (CRVO eyes), fellow eyes of CRVO patients (fellow eyes), and control eyes. Complete ocular examination and AS-OCT were performed for each eye. The AS-OCT parameters (anterior chamber depth, scleral spur angle, angle opening distance [AOD] at 500 and 750 μm from scleral spur [AOD500 and 750] and trabecular-iris space area [TISA] at 500 and 750 μm from scleral spur [TISA500 and 750]) and the rate of narrow angles (based on gonioscopy) in CRVO and fellow eyes were compared with control eyes.
Results
The mean (SD) age of the patients and the control group were 60.09 (9.43) and 59.52 (6.66), respectively. The mean intraocular pressure in both eyes of the patients was significantly higher than the control eyes (P < 0.05). All AS-OCT parameters were significantly different among the three groups (P < 0.05). Comparing with the control eyes, CRVO eyes had shallower anterior chamber depth (2.53 vs. 2.85 mm; P = 0.002) and narrower AS-OCT angle parameters (scleral spur angle, AOD500 and 750, TISA500 and 750). Fellow eyes had also shallower anterior chamber depth (2.56 vs. 2.85 mm; P = 0.005) than control eyes and smaller scleral spur angle, AOD500 and AOD750. Five CRVO patients (23.8%) were diagnosed with narrow angles in both eyes based on gonioscopy, whereas no eye in the control group had narrow angles (P = 0.05).
Conclusion
Imaging with AS-OCT showed that CRVO patients had shallower anterior chamber depth and narrower angle parameters in both eyes in comparison with control eyes. Furthermore, CRVO patients had higher rates of narrow angles on gonioscopic examination.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts4
In a cross-sectional case-control study, the mean intraocular pressure in both eyes of patients with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) was significantly higher than in control eyes (P < 0.05).
In a cross-sectional case-control study, central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) eyes had a shallower anterior chamber depth (2.53 vs. 2.85 mm; P = 0.002) and narrower AS-OCT angle parameters (scleral spur angle, AOD500 and 750, TISA500 and 750) compared to control eyes.
In a cross-sectional case-control study, fellow eyes of patients with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) had a shallower anterior chamber depth (2.56 vs. 2.85 mm; P = 0.005) than control eyes and smaller scleral spur angle, AOD500, and AOD750.
In a cross-sectional case-control study, 5 out of 21 (23.8%) central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) patients were diagnosed with narrow angles in both eyes based on gonioscopy, whereas no eye in the control group had narrow angles (P = 0.05).
Related Articles5
Assessment of Schlemm's canal with swept-source optical coherence tomography in Graves' ophthalmopathy.
Cross-Sectional StudyEvaluation of Iridocorneal Angle, Choroidal Thickness, and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Children With a History of Retinopathy of Prematurity.
Cross-Sectional StudyAnterior segment evaluation of infants with retinopathy of prematurity.
Case SeriesAngle-closure glaucoma-simpler answers to complex mechanisms: LXVI Edward Jackson Memorial Lecture.
ReviewDiabetic iris neovascularization.
Case SeriesIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.