Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

Acta OphthalmolMay 201615 citations

Relationship between oxygen saturation of the retinal vessels and visual field defect in glaucoma patients: comparison with each hemifield.

Shimazaki Takeru, Hirooka Kazuyuki, Nakano Yuki, Nitta Eri, Ukegawa Kaori, Sato Shino, Tsujikawa Akitaka


AI Summary

Glaucoma patients with worse visual field defects showed higher retinal venous oxygen saturation, suggesting reduced oxygen extraction due to ganglion cell loss, which may indicate metabolic dysfunction.

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to elucidate the relationship between visual field defects in the upper and lower hemifields and the corresponding oxygen saturation of the retinal vessels in patients with glaucoma.

Methods

Patients with glaucoma (n = 44) exhibiting more than a 10 dB difference between the upper and lower total deviation (TD) were enrolled in the study. After measuring the retinal vessel oxygen saturation by a non-invasive spectrophotometric retinal oximeter, the hemifields in one eye of each patient were divided into worse (worse TD) and better (better TD) hemifield areas. We additionally evaluated a separate group of 40 patients with glaucoma who exhibited less than a 5 dB difference between the upper and lower TD. Statistical analysis was performed using a Student's t-test.

Results

A higher mean venous saturation of oxygen (SaO 2 ) was observed in the worse (59.0 ± 8.0%) hemifield compared to the better (55.4 ± 7.2%) hemifield (p < 0.01). The mean arteriovenous difference in the SaO 2 was lower in the worse (44.4 ± 9.0%) hemifield compared to the better (48.6 ± 11.4%) hemifield (p = 0.02). However, when we evaluated the worse and better hemifields in the patients who had less than a 5 dB difference in the upper and lower hemifield TD, we found no statistically significant differences for either the retinal SaO 2 in the venous vessels or the arteriovenous difference.

Conclusions

Advanced glaucomatous visual field defects were associated with increased SaO 2 in the venous vessels and a decreased arteriovenous difference in the SaO 2 . The present results suggest there is a reduced retinal oxygen extraction in eyes with glaucomatous damage due to retinal ganglion cell loss.


MeSH Terms

AgedExfoliation SyndromeFemaleGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansIntraocular PressureLow Tension GlaucomaMaleMiddle AgedOximetryOxygenRetinal VesselsTonometry, OcularVision DisordersVisual Field TestsVisual Fields

Key Concepts5

A higher mean venous saturation of oxygen (SaO2) was observed in the worse (59.0 +/- 8.0%) hemifield compared to the better (55.4 +/- 7.2%) hemifield (p < 0.01) in 44 glaucoma patients exhibiting more than a 10 dB difference between the upper and lower total deviation (TD).

MechanismCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=44 patients with glaucomaCh5Ch6Ch12

The mean arteriovenous difference in the SaO2 was lower in the worse (44.4 +/- 9.0%) hemifield compared to the better (48.6 +/- 11.4%) hemifield (p = 0.02) in 44 glaucoma patients exhibiting more than a 10 dB difference between the upper and lower total deviation (TD).

MechanismCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=44 patients with glaucomaCh5Ch6Ch12

Advanced glaucomatous visual field defects were associated with increased SaO2 in the venous vessels and a decreased arteriovenous difference in the SaO2.

PrognosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=44 patients with glaucomaCh5Ch6Ch12

The results suggest reduced retinal oxygen extraction in eyes with glaucomatous damage due to retinal ganglion cell loss.

MechanismCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=44 patients with glaucomaCh2Ch5Ch12

No statistically significant differences for either retinal SaO2 in venous vessels or arteriovenous difference were found when evaluating worse and better hemifields in a separate group of 40 glaucoma patients who had less than a 5 dB difference in the upper and lower hemifield TD.

MechanismCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=40 patients with glaucomaCh5Ch6Ch12

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.