Outcomes of Trabeculectomy With Mitomycin-C in Uveitis Associated With Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada Disease.
Almobarak Faisal A, Alharbi Ali H, Morales Jose, Aljadaan Ibrahim
AI Summary
Trabeculectomy with MMC for VKH-associated uveitic glaucoma offers acceptable intermediate-term IOP control, but many eyes require further procedures, highlighting the need for continuous monitoring.
Abstract
Objectives
To evaluate the outcomes of trabeculectomy with mitomycin-C (MMC) in uveitis associated with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease (VKH).
Methods
Retrospective cohort study included 27 eyes of 15 patients with uveitic glaucoma associated with VKH disease who underwent trabeculectomy with MMC as a first glaucoma procedure at King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia between 1992 and 2011. The main outcome measures were: the intraocular pressure (IOP), the number of antiglaucoma medications, the presence of visually threatening complications, and the need for further surgeries to control the IOP.
Results
The mean follow-up was 78.19 months. The IOP decreased significantly from a mean of 40.15±7.0 to 13.12±6.9 mm Hg on the last follow-up (P<0.01) as well as during the whole follow-up period. The number of medications needed to control the IOP also decreased significantly from 3.89±0.6 to 1.04±1.3. The cumulative probabilities of success were 77.8%, 74.1%, 63.0%, and 51.9% at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months postoperatively, respectively. The most common complications were cataract development and progression (53.8%), hypotony (IOP≤5 mm Hg) (33.3%), choroidal effusion (7.4%), and decompressive retinopathy (7.4%). Eight eyes (29.6%) needed a second procedure to control the IOP.
Conclusions
Trabeculectomy with MMC offers an acceptable intermediate term success and IOP control in uveitic glaucoma associated with VKH. However, significant number of eyes needed further procedures to control the pressure. Therefore, continuous monitoring of the pressure is important.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts6
Trabeculectomy with mitomycin-C (MMC) in uveitic glaucoma associated with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease significantly decreased intraocular pressure (IOP) from a mean of 40.15±7.0 mmHg to 13.12±6.9 mmHg on the last follow-up (P<0.01) over a mean follow-up of 78.19 months.
The number of antiglaucoma medications needed to control IOP in patients with uveitic glaucoma associated with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease who underwent trabeculectomy with mitomycin-C (MMC) decreased significantly from 3.89±0.6 to 1.04±1.3.
The cumulative probabilities of success for trabeculectomy with mitomycin-C (MMC) in uveitic glaucoma associated with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease were 77.8% at 12 months, 74.1% at 24 months, 63.0% at 36 months, and 51.9% at 48 months postoperatively.
The most common complications following trabeculectomy with mitomycin-C (MMC) in uveitic glaucoma associated with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease were cataract development and progression (53.8%), hypotony (IOP≤5 mmHg) (33.3%), choroidal effusion (7.4%), and decompressive retinopathy (7.4%).
Eight eyes (29.6%) of patients with uveitic glaucoma associated with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease who underwent trabeculectomy with mitomycin-C (MMC) needed a second procedure to control the intraocular pressure (IOP).
Trabeculectomy with mitomycin-C (MMC) offers acceptable intermediate-term success and IOP control in uveitic glaucoma associated with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease.
Related Articles5
One tube for all: 1-year outcomes after transition to Paul glaucoma implant at a tertiary centre.
Observational StudyCytomegalovirus Anterior Uveitis: Clinical Characteristics and Long-term Outcomes in a French Series.
Case SeriesTrabeculectomy with mitomycin C in secondary glaucoma associated with Behçet disease.
Cohort StudyNon-penetrating glaucoma surgery augmented with mitomycin C or 5-fluorouracil in eyes at high risk of failure of filtration surgery: long-term results.
Cohort StudyTrabeculectomy with 5-fluorouracil for adult inflammatory glaucoma.
Case SeriesIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.