Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

Invest Ophthalmol Vis SciJanuary 20180 citations

Outer Retinal Dysfunction in the Absence of Structural Abnormalities in Multiple Sclerosis.

Hanson James V M, Hediger Michael, Manogaran Praveena, Landau Klara, Hagenbuch Niels, Schippling Sven, Gerth-Kahlert Christina


AI Summary

MS patients showed outer retinal dysfunction (delayed ERG responses) without structural abnormalities, suggesting primary retinal involvement beyond optic neuritis.

Abstract

Purpose

Recent evidence suggests structural changes distal to the inner retina in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. The functional correlates of these proposed structural abnormalities remain unclear. We investigated outer retinal function and structure in MS patients, and quantified to what extent outer retinal structure influenced function in these patients.

Methods

Outer retinal function was assessed using the full-field and multifocal electroretinogram (ERG/MF-ERG), whereas retinal structure was assessed using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT). Results were compared with preexisting normative data. The relationships between electrophysiology parameters and the OCT values corresponding to the proposed cellular origins of the ERG and MF-ERG were analyzed.

Results

Most electrophysiological responses were delayed in MS patients, independently of optic neuritis (ON). Inner retinal thickness and volumes were reduced, and inner nuclear layer volume marginally increased, in eyes with previous ON; all other OCT parameters were normal. OCT results correlated with ERG amplitudes, but not with ERG peak times or any MF-ERG parameters.

Conclusions

We recorded outer retinal dysfunction without detectable abnormalities of the corresponding retinal layers in MS patients, not ascribable to retrograde degeneration following ON. The findings complement a growing body of literature reporting primary retinal abnormalities distal to the ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer complex in MS patients, with our data suggesting that this may be a more widespread phenomenon than previously thought. ERG may be of more utility in detecting retinal dysfunction in MS patients than MF-ERG. Analysis of peak times, rather than response amplitudes, is recommended.


MeSH Terms

AdolescentAdultAgedAxonsCross-Sectional StudiesElectroretinographyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisOptic NeuritisRetinaRetinal DiseasesRetinal Ganglion CellsTomography, Optical CoherenceYoung Adult

Key Concepts5

Most electrophysiological responses, assessed using full-field and multifocal electroretinogram (ERG/MF-ERG), were delayed in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, independently of optic neuritis (ON).

DiagnosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=MS patients compared to normative dataCh5Ch7

Inner retinal thickness and volumes were reduced, and inner nuclear layer volume marginally increased, in eyes of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients with previous optic neuritis (ON), as assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT).

DiagnosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=MS patients compared to normative dataCh5

Outer retinal dysfunction was recorded in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients without detectable abnormalities of the corresponding retinal layers, and this dysfunction was not ascribable to retrograde degeneration following optic neuritis (ON).

MechanismCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=MS patients compared to normative dataCh5Ch7

Electroretinogram (ERG) may be of more utility in detecting retinal dysfunction in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients than multifocal electroretinogram (MF-ERG), and analysis of peak times, rather than response amplitudes, is recommended.

DiagnosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=MS patients compared to normative dataCh5Ch7

Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) results correlated with full-field electroretinogram (ERG) amplitudes in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, but not with ERG peak times or any multifocal electroretinogram (MF-ERG) parameters.

DiagnosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=MS patients compared to normative dataCh5Ch7

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.