Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

Monheit Blythe E

5 articles in GJC

5 articles in GJC

1.

Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 to discriminate glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes.

De León-Ortega Julio E, Sakata Lisandro M, Monheit Blythe E, McGwin Gerald, Arthur Stella N, Girkin Christopher A

Am J OphthalmolOct 200743 citationsCase-Control Study

This study compared HRT II and HRT 3 for glaucoma diagnosis, finding HRT 3's vertical cup-to-disc ratio (VCDR) offered higher sensitivity, but the Glaucoma Probability Score (GPS) had diagnostic issues related to disc size.

2.

Effect of glaucomatous damage on repeatability of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, scanning laser polarimetry, and optical coherence tomography.

DeLeón Ortega Julio E, Sakata Lisandro M, Kakati Bobby, McGwin Gerald, Monheit Blythe E, Arthur Stella N et al.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis SciMar 200783 citationsObservational Study

This study found that while some glaucoma measurement repeatability (GDx RNFL, HRT-II vertical C/D) was stable, others (ONH topography) worsened with disease severity, suggesting specific parameters are better for monitoring advanced glaucoma.

3.

Comparison of the Moorfields classification using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and subjective optic disc classification in detecting glaucoma in blacks and whites.

Girkin Christopher A, DeLeon-Ortega Julio E, Xie Aiyuan, McGwin Gerald, Arthur Stella N, Monheit Blythe E

OphthalmologyDec 200625 citationsCross-Sectional Study

This study compared glaucoma detection methods, finding subjective optic disc grading by specialists outperformed Moorfields classification in both Black and White patients, suggesting its greater clinical reliability.

4.

Discrimination between glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes using quantitative imaging devices and subjective optic nerve head assessment.

Deleón-Ortega Julio E, Arthur Stella N, McGwin Gerald, Xie Aiyuan, Monheit Blythe E, Girkin Christopher A

Invest Ophthalmol Vis SciAug 2006136 citationsObservational Study

This study compared quantitative imaging devices and subjective optic nerve head assessment for glaucoma diagnosis. Subjective assessment performed best, indicating its continued importance alongside imaging in clinical practice.

All 5 articles loaded