Wong Hon-Tym

Baskaran Mani, Kumar Rajesh S, Friedman David S, Lu Qing-Shu, Wong Hon-Tym, Chew Paul T K et al.

LPI in asymptomatic angle-closure suspects significantly reduced progression to angle closure or glaucoma over 5 years, but the overall progression rate was low.

Kumar Rajesh S, Baskaran Mani, Friedman David S, Xu Ying, Wong Hon-Tym, Lavanya Raghavan et al.

Prophylactic laser iridotomy in angle closure suspects showed a small, similar corneal endothelial cell density decrease in treated and untreated eyes over 3 years, suggesting no significant LPI-specific long-term harm.

How Alicia C, Baskaran Mani, Kumar Rajesh S, He Mingguang, Foster Paul J, Lavanya Raghavan et al.

This study found laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) significantly opens the anterior chamber angle in angle-closure suspects by reducing iris curvature, increasing chamber area and volume.

Lavanya Raghavan, Baskaran Mani, Kumar Rajesh S, Wong Hon-Tym, Chew Paul T K, Foster Paul J et al.

Dilation with tropicamide and acetazolamide in Asian narrow-angle patients showed a low (0.64%) acute angle closure risk. Narrower angles predicted IOP elevation, suggesting safe dilation but highlighting specific risk factors.

Kumar Rajesh S, Baskaran Mani, Chew Paul T K, Friedman David S, Handa Swati, Lavanya Raghavan et al.

This UBM study found plateau iris in one-third of primary angle closure suspect eyes after LPI, highlighting a significant anatomical variant requiring further research into its clinical management implications.

Ang Marcus H N, Baskaran Mani, Kumar Rajesh S, Chew Paul T K, Oen Francis T S, Wong Hon-Tym et al.

Singaporean ophthalmologists were surveyed on asymptomatic angle closure. Most recommend prophylactic laser iridotomy to prevent acute attacks, but fewer believe it prevents chronic glaucoma, highlighting varied management approaches.

Loon Seng-Chee, Chew Paul T K, Oen Francis T S, Chan Yiong-Huak, Wong Hon-Tym, Seah Steve K L et al.

Iris ischemic changes after acute primary angle closure were studied. The key finding was that these changes may not be associated with worse visual outcomes, suggesting less clinical concern for this specific sign.