Sachiyo Okude

Comparative Analysis of 24-2C, 24-2, and 10-2 Visual Field Tests for Detecting Mild-Stage Glaucoma With Central Visual field Defects.

The 24-2C SITA Faster test is highly effective and efficient for detecting mild-stage glaucoma with central visual-field defects. This, and its reduced duration, makes it a valuable tool in clinical settings.

A Novel Visual Field Screening Program for Glaucoma With a Head-Mounted Perimeter.

Visual field screening using a head-mounted perimeter 'imo' detected glaucoma at all stages in a short time with high accuracy.

Correlation of Binocular Perimetry Screening Using imo: A Portable Head Mounted Perimeter With 10-2 Standard Automated Perimetry for Early Glaucoma With Central Visual Field Defects.

The imo portable head-mounted perimeter was found to correlate with 10-2 standard automated perimetry in glaucoma patients with central visual field defects and has the potential to shorten visual field testing times.

Comparison of Glaucoma Detection Performance of Binocular Perimetry Screening Program Using imo Perimetry With Frequency Doubling Technology.

The ISP demonstrates non-inferiority in detecting glaucoma and has a shorter testing time compared with FDT. These findings provide evidence for applied further studies on large-scale population-based glaucoma screening.

Comparison of MP-3 Microperimetry and Humphrey 10-2 for Central Visual Field Testing in Mild Glaucoma.

The MP-3 Central Goldmann size II program showed strong correlation with HFA 10-2 SITA-Standard in measuring central visual field sensitivity.

A Comparison of 24-2C Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Faster and 10-2 SITA Standard for Detecting Damage in the Macula in Mild-Stage Glaucoma.

24-2C SITA Faster is a noninferior and more time-efficient alternative to 10-2 SITA Standard for detecting macular damage in mild-stage glaucoma; however, 10-2 SITA Standard may be considered superior for detecting subtle macular defects using PD.

A Prospective Study of a New 24-2C Algorithm Using the Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm Standard.

There were no significant differences in global indices between the 24-2C SITA Standard and 24-2C SITA Faster.