Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

Invest Ophthalmol Vis SciNovember 201924 citations

Visual Field Loss in Patients With Diabetes in the Absence of Clinically-Detectable Vascular Retinopathy in a Nationally Representative Survey.

Bao Yicheng K, Yan Yan, Gordon Mae, McGill Janet B, Kass Michael, Rajagopal Rithwick


AI Summary

Diabetic patients without visible retinopathy show visual field defects, which worsen with higher HbA1c, suggesting neuroretinopathy precedes classic microvascular disease and warrants earlier detection.

Abstract

Purpose

Neuroretinopathy is increasingly being recognized as an independent cause of vision loss in diabetes. Visual field loss, as detected by frequency doubling technology (FDT)-based visual perimetry, is a sign of neuroretinopathy and occurs in early stages of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Here, we hypothesized that FDT visual field testing could identify patients with diabetic neuroretinopathy in the absence of clinically detectable microvascular DR.

Methods

All National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2008 participants receiving fundus photography and visual field screening by FDT were included in this study. Participants with self-reported glaucoma, use of glaucoma medications, or determination of glaucoma based on disk features were excluded. Visual fields were screened using FDT protocol in which participants underwent a 19-subfield suprathreshold test.

Results

Patients with diabetes but no DR were more likely to have ≥1 subfield defects at 5%, 2%, and 1% probability levels than patients without diabetes (41.3% vs. 28.6%; 27.4% vs. 17.5%; 15.9% vs. 9.4%; all P < 0.0008). Multivariable regression showed that each additional glycated hemoglobin % (HbA1c) was associated with 19% greater odds of having ≥1 visual subfield defects in those with diabetes without DR (odds ratio: 1.19, 95% confidence interval: 1.07-1.33; P = 0.0020).

Conclusions

Patients with diabetes have visual field defects in the absence of clinically detectable DR, suggesting neuroretinopathy precedes classical microvascular disease. These defects become more frequent with the onset of visible retinopathy and worsen as the retinopathy becomes more severe. Longitudinal studies are required to understand the pathogenesis of diabetic neuroretinopathy in relation to classic DR.


MeSH Terms

Blood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic RetinopathyFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHealth SurveysHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysPhotographyVision DisordersVisual Field TestsVisual Fields

Key Concepts4

Patients with diabetes but no clinically detectable diabetic retinopathy (DR) were more likely to have ≥1 subfield defects at 5%, 2%, and 1% probability levels (41.3% vs. 28.6%; 27.4% vs. 17.5%; 15.9% vs. 9.4%; all P < 0.0008) when screened using frequency doubling technology (FDT) protocol (19-subfield suprathreshold test) compared to patients without diabetes.

DiagnosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=National Health and Nutrition Examina…Ch6Ch7Ch19

Multivariable regression showed that each additional glycated hemoglobin % (HbA1c) was associated with 19% greater odds of having ≥1 visual subfield defects in patients with diabetes without clinically detectable diabetic retinopathy (odds ratio: 1.19, 95% confidence interval: 1.07-1.33; P = 0.0020).

PrognosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional study with multivariable regressionn=National Health and Nutrition Examina…Ch6Ch7Ch19

Patients with diabetes have visual field defects in the absence of clinically detectable diabetic retinopathy (DR), suggesting neuroretinopathy precedes classical microvascular disease.

DiagnosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=National Health and Nutrition Examina…Ch6Ch7Ch19

Visual field loss, as detected by frequency doubling technology (FDT)-based visual perimetry, is a sign of neuroretinopathy and occurs in early stages of diabetic retinopathy (DR).

DiagnosisExpert OpinionBackground Informationn=Not applicableCh6Ch7Ch19

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.