Visual Field Loss in Patients With Diabetes in the Absence of Clinically-Detectable Vascular Retinopathy in a Nationally Representative Survey.
Bao Yicheng K, Yan Yan, Gordon Mae, McGill Janet B, Kass Michael, Rajagopal Rithwick
AI Summary
Diabetic patients without visible retinopathy show visual field defects, which worsen with higher HbA1c, suggesting neuroretinopathy precedes classic microvascular disease and warrants earlier detection.
Abstract
Purpose
Neuroretinopathy is increasingly being recognized as an independent cause of vision loss in diabetes. Visual field loss, as detected by frequency doubling technology (FDT)-based visual perimetry, is a sign of neuroretinopathy and occurs in early stages of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Here, we hypothesized that FDT visual field testing could identify patients with diabetic neuroretinopathy in the absence of clinically detectable microvascular DR.
Methods
All National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2008 participants receiving fundus photography and visual field screening by FDT were included in this study. Participants with self-reported glaucoma, use of glaucoma medications, or determination of glaucoma based on disk features were excluded. Visual fields were screened using FDT protocol in which participants underwent a 19-subfield suprathreshold test.
Results
Patients with diabetes but no DR were more likely to have ≥1 subfield defects at 5%, 2%, and 1% probability levels than patients without diabetes (41.3% vs. 28.6%; 27.4% vs. 17.5%; 15.9% vs. 9.4%; all P < 0.0008). Multivariable regression showed that each additional glycated hemoglobin % (HbA1c) was associated with 19% greater odds of having ≥1 visual subfield defects in those with diabetes without DR (odds ratio: 1.19, 95% confidence interval: 1.07-1.33; P = 0.0020).
Conclusions
Patients with diabetes have visual field defects in the absence of clinically detectable DR, suggesting neuroretinopathy precedes classical microvascular disease. These defects become more frequent with the onset of visible retinopathy and worsen as the retinopathy becomes more severe. Longitudinal studies are required to understand the pathogenesis of diabetic neuroretinopathy in relation to classic DR.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts4
Patients with diabetes but no clinically detectable diabetic retinopathy (DR) were more likely to have ≥1 subfield defects at 5%, 2%, and 1% probability levels (41.3% vs. 28.6%; 27.4% vs. 17.5%; 15.9% vs. 9.4%; all P < 0.0008) when screened using frequency doubling technology (FDT) protocol (19-subfield suprathreshold test) compared to patients without diabetes.
Multivariable regression showed that each additional glycated hemoglobin % (HbA1c) was associated with 19% greater odds of having ≥1 visual subfield defects in patients with diabetes without clinically detectable diabetic retinopathy (odds ratio: 1.19, 95% confidence interval: 1.07-1.33; P = 0.0020).
Patients with diabetes have visual field defects in the absence of clinically detectable diabetic retinopathy (DR), suggesting neuroretinopathy precedes classical microvascular disease.
Visual field loss, as detected by frequency doubling technology (FDT)-based visual perimetry, is a sign of neuroretinopathy and occurs in early stages of diabetic retinopathy (DR).
Related Articles5
Automated static perimetry: the influence of myopia and its method of correction.
Case SeriesPrevalence, Risk Factors, and Visual Features of Undiagnosed Glaucoma: The Singapore Epidemiology of Eye Diseases Study.
Cross-Sectional StudyClinical evaluation of frequency doubling technology perimetry using the Humphrey Matrix 24-2 threshold strategy.
Cross-Sectional StudyPrevalence, Features, and Severity of Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss Measured With the 10-2 Achromatic Threshold Visual Field Test.
Observational StudyDiabetes can alter the interpretation of visual dysfunction in ocular hypertension.
Cohort StudyIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.