Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

J Cataract Refract SurgJuly 201918 citations

Development and validation of a new intraocular pressure estimate for patients with soft corneas.

Chen Kai-Jung, Eliasy Ashkan, Vinciguerra Riccardo, Abass Ahmed, Lopes Bernardo T, Vinciguerra Paolo, Ambrósio Renato, Roberts Cynthia J, Elsheikh Ahmed


AI Summary

Researchers developed and validated a new algorithm (bIOPs) for soft corneas, showing it reliably estimates IOP in keratoconus, improving accuracy over standard methods and reducing corneal biomechanics dependence.

Abstract

Purpose

To introduce and clinically validate a new method of estimating intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with keratoconus and soft corneas with the aim of significantly reducing dependence on corneal biomechanics.

Setting

Vincieye Clinic, Milan, Italy, and Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group, Brazil.

Design

Retrospective case series.

Method

This study comprised participants enrolled at two hospitals on two continents. Numerical analysis based on the finite element method was performed to simulate the effect of tonometric air pressure of the Corvis ST dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer on eye globes with wide variations in thickness, geometry, and tissue. The numerical predictions of ocular behavior were used to develop a new algorithm to produce predictions of the biomechanically corrected IOP (bIOP) in eyes with a soft cornea (bIOP s ). Predictions of the bIOP s were assessed in the keratoconic clinical datasets (because on average these corneas are softer) and compared with the previously developed bIOP algorithm predictions obtained for normal healthy eyes.

Results

The study comprised 722 eyes (722 participants). The main outcome was the absence of a significant difference in IOP between healthy eyes and keratoconic eyes when the bIOP and bIOP s algorithms were used (P > .05). There was, however, a significant difference with the uncorrected Scheimpflug analyzer IOP in both groups (P < .001). Furthermore, the bIOP s predictions were significantly less affected by corneal thickness and patient age than the Scheimpflug analyzer IOP.

Conclusion

The bIOP s algorithm was more reliable at estimating the IOP in eyes with a soft cornea and was validated for use in eyes with keratoconus.


MeSH Terms

AdolescentAdultAgedAlgorithmsBiomechanical PhenomenaCorneaCorneal PachymetryCorneal TopographyDatasets as TopicFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansIntraocular PressureKeratoconusMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesTonometry, OcularYoung Adult

Key Concepts4

The biomechanically corrected IOP (bIOPs) algorithm was more reliable at estimating the intraocular pressure (IOP) in eyes with a soft cornea and was validated for use in eyes with keratoconus.

DiagnosisCase seriesRetrospective case seriesn=722 eyes (722 participants)Ch3Ch17

There was no significant difference in intraocular pressure (IOP) between healthy eyes and keratoconic eyes when the biomechanically corrected IOP (bIOP) and bIOPs algorithms were used (P > .05) in a retrospective case series of 722 eyes.

DiagnosisCase seriesRetrospective case seriesn=722 eyes (722 participants)Ch3Ch17

There was a significant difference in intraocular pressure (IOP) with the uncorrected Scheimpflug analyzer IOP in both healthy and keratoconic eyes (P < .001) in a retrospective case series of 722 eyes.

DiagnosisCase seriesRetrospective case seriesn=722 eyes (722 participants)Ch3Ch17

The biomechanically corrected IOP (bIOPs) predictions were significantly less affected by corneal thickness and patient age than the Scheimpflug analyzer intraocular pressure (IOP) in a retrospective case series of 722 eyes.

DiagnosisCase seriesRetrospective case seriesn=722 eyes (722 participants)Ch3

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.