Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

Transl Vis Sci TechnolJune 202012 citations

A Retrospective Comparison of Deep Learning to Manual Annotations for Optic Disc and Optic Cup Segmentation in Fundus Photographs.

Fu Huazhu, Li Fei, Xu Yanwu, Liao Jingan, Xiong Jian, Shen Jianbing, Liu Jiang, Zhang Xiulan


AI Summary

This study developed a deep learning system for optic disc/cup segmentation in fundus photos. It performed well, showing potential to assist ophthalmologists in glaucoma diagnosis by accurately calculating cup-to-disc ratios.

Abstract

Purpose

Optic disc (OD) and optic cup (OC) segmentation are fundamental for fundus image analysis. Manual annotation is time consuming, expensive, and highly subjective, whereas an automated system is invaluable to the medical community. The aim of this study is to develop a deep learning system to segment OD and OC in fundus photographs, and evaluate how the algorithm compares against manual annotations.

Methods

A total of 1200 fundus photographs with 120 glaucoma cases were collected. The OD and OC annotations were labeled by seven licensed ophthalmologists, and glaucoma diagnoses were based on comprehensive evaluations of the subject medical records. A deep learning system for OD and OC segmentation was developed. The performances of segmentation and glaucoma discriminating based on the cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) of automated model were compared against the manual annotations.

Results

The algorithm achieved an OD dice of 0.938 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.934-0.941), OC dice of 0.801 (95% CI = 0.793-0.809), and CDR mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.077 (95% CI = 0.073 mean absolute error (MAE)0.082). For glaucoma discriminating based on CDR calculations, the algorithm obtained an area under receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.948 (95% CI = 0.920 mean absolute error (MAE)0.973), with a sensitivity of 0.850 (95% CI = 0.794-0.923) and specificity of 0.853 (95% CI = 0.798-0.918).

Conclusions

We demonstrated the potential of the deep learning system to assist ophthalmologists in analyzing OD and OC segmentation and discriminating glaucoma from nonglaucoma subjects based on CDR calculations.

Translational relevance: We investigate the segmentation of OD and OC by deep learning system compared against the manual annotations.


MeSH Terms

Deep LearningDiagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalFundus OculiHumansOptic DiskRetrospective Studies

Key Concepts4

A deep learning system for optic disc (OD) and optic cup (OC) segmentation achieved an OD dice of 0.938 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.934-0.941) and OC dice of 0.801 (95% CI = 0.793-0.809) when compared against manual annotations.

Comparative EffectivenessCohortRetrospective Comparisonn=1200 fundus photographs with 120 glau…Ch5Ch28

The deep learning system for optic disc (OD) and optic cup (OC) segmentation achieved a cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.077 (95% CI = 0.073-0.082) when compared against manual annotations.

Comparative EffectivenessCohortRetrospective Comparisonn=1200 fundus photographs with 120 glau…Ch5Ch28

For glaucoma discriminating based on cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) calculations, the deep learning system obtained an area under receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.948 (95% CI = 0.920-0.973), with a sensitivity of 0.850 (95% CI = 0.794-0.923) and specificity of 0.853 (95% CI = 0.798-0.918).

DiagnosisCohortRetrospective Comparisonn=1200 fundus photographs with 120 glau…Ch5Ch7Ch28

A retrospective comparison study developed a deep learning system for optic disc (OD) and optic cup (OC) segmentation using 1200 fundus photographs, including 120 glaucoma cases, with annotations labeled by seven licensed ophthalmologists.

MethodologyCohortRetrospective Comparisonn=1200 fundus photographs with 120 glau…Ch5Ch28

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.