Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

J GlaucomaSeptember 20207 citations

Effects of Acute Atmospheric Pressure Changes on Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Normal Individuals: A Pilot Study.

Albis-Donado Oscar, Rodríguez-Camacho Brenda, Bhartiya Shibal, Ramírez-Neria Paulina, López-Star Ellery, González-Daher Pamela, Badillo-Fernandez Mariana, Stalmans Ingeborg


AI Summary

This pilot study found acute atmospheric pressure changes affect GAT and DCT intraocular pressure readings differently, with their measurement difference increasing at lower atmospheric pressures.

Abstract

Unlabelled: PRéCIS:: Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement differences with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) are affected by atmospheric pressure inside a hyperbaric chamber.

Purpose

To compare IOP measurements obtained with GAT and DCT in 22 normal individuals at different atmospheric pressures simulated in a hyperbaric chamber.

Methods

The IOP of both eyes of 22 healthy volunteers was measured using GAT and DCT at 4 different atmospheric pressure levels.Starting at 1 Queretaro atmospheric pressure (QATM), the IOP was measured with GAT and DCT. The atmospheric pressure was then increased to 1.1 QATM (equivalent to 1032 m above sea level), 1.2 QATM (equivalent to 315 m above sea level), and 1.25 QATM (equivalent to sea level), starting 5 minutes after reaching each level. The limits of agreement between various measurements with each tonometer were calculated using the Bland-Altman plots.

Results

The first 4 subjects were used to measure feasibility, consistency, variability, and the time needed for IOP to return to baseline after each atmospheric pressure increase.For the entire 44 eyes, the mean GAT IOP at 1 QATM was 12.23 mm Hg (range, 8 to 20 mm Hg; SD, 2.84) and mean DCT was 16.36 (range, 12.1 to 25.3; SD, 2.84), with a mean 4.14 mm Hg difference (range, -0.1 to 7.5 mm Hg; SD, 1.62; P<0.001).Using the second measurements of the first 4 subjects and those after 5 minutes of adaptation for the rest of the group at 1.1 QATM, mean GAT IOP was 11.05±2.68 mm Hg and mean DCT IOP was 15.60±3.02 mm Hg, for a mean difference between instruments of 4.56±1.81 mm Hg (P<0.001).At 1.2 QATM, mean GAT IOP was 11.14±2.53 mm Hg and mean DCT IOP was 15.39±2.91 mm Hg. The difference between instruments was 4.25±2.12 mm Hg (P<0.001).At 1.25 QATM, the mean GAT IOP was 12.39±3.11 mm Hg and mean DCT IOP was 14.91±2.73 mm Hg. The difference between instruments after 5 minutes of adaptation was 2.53±1.62 mm Hg (P<0.001).Generalized estimating equations for performing linear regression multivariable analysis using atmospheric pressure, expressed as altitude, and age as covariates, shows that the difference between GAT and DCT increases by 1 mm Hg per 673 m of increase of altitude above sea level. Age was not a significant predictor.

Conclusions

Acute changes in atmospheric pressure induce changes in IOP measurements for both GAT and DCT and in different directions. Despite the limitation of sample size, it may be postulated that the difference of IOP measurements between the 2 tonometers increases with lower atmospheric pressures.


MeSH Terms

AdultAtmospheric PressureFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansHyperbaric OxygenationIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsReproducibility of ResultsTonometry, Ocular

Key Concepts5

The mean Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) intraocular pressure (IOP) at 1 Queretaro atmospheric pressure (QATM) was 12.23 mm Hg (range, 8 to 20 mm Hg; SD, 2.84) and mean dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) IOP was 16.36 mm Hg (range, 12.1 to 25.3 mm Hg; SD, 2.84) in 44 eyes of 22 healthy volunteers, with a mean 4.14 mm Hg difference (range, -0.1 to 7.5 mm Hg; SD, 1.62; P<0.001).

Comparative EffectivenessCross-sectionalPilot Studyn=44 eyes of 22 healthy volunteersCh3

At 1.25 Queretaro atmospheric pressure (QATM), the mean Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) intraocular pressure (IOP) was 12.39±3.11 mm Hg and mean dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) IOP was 14.91±2.73 mm Hg in 44 eyes of 22 healthy volunteers, with a difference between instruments of 2.53±1.62 mm Hg (P<0.001) after 5 minutes of adaptation.

Comparative EffectivenessCross-sectionalPilot Studyn=44 eyes of 22 healthy volunteersCh3

Generalized estimating equations for performing linear regression multivariable analysis using atmospheric pressure (expressed as altitude) and age as covariates showed that the difference between Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements increases by 1 mm Hg per 673 m of increase of altitude above sea level in 44 eyes of 22 healthy volunteers.

MechanismCross-sectionalPilot Studyn=44 eyes of 22 healthy volunteersCh3

Acute changes in atmospheric pressure induce changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements for both Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) in different directions in 44 eyes of 22 healthy volunteers.

MechanismCross-sectionalPilot Studyn=44 eyes of 22 healthy volunteersCh3

The difference of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements between Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) may be postulated to increase with lower atmospheric pressures, despite the limitation of sample size, in 44 eyes of 22 healthy volunteers.

MechanismCross-sectionalPilot Studyn=44 eyes of 22 healthy volunteersCh3

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.