Deep Learning Image Analysis of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Measured Vessel Density Improves Classification of Healthy and Glaucoma Eyes.
Bowd Christopher, Belghith Akram, Zangwill Linda M, Christopher Mark, Goldbaum Michael H, Fan Rui, Rezapour Jasmin, Moghimi Sasan, Kamalipour Alireza, Hou Huiyuan
AI Summary
Deep learning analysis of OCTA images significantly improved glaucoma diagnosis compared to traditional methods using OCTA measurements or OCT nerve fiber layer thickness.
Abstract
Purpose
To compare convolutional neural network (CNN) analysis of en face vessel density images to gradient boosting classifier (GBC) analysis of instrument-provided, feature-based optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) vessel density measurements and OCT retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measurements for classifying healthy and glaucomatous eyes.
Design
Comparison of diagnostic approaches.
Methods
A total of 130 eyes of 80 healthy individuals and 275 eyes of 185 glaucoma patients with optic nerve head (ONH) OCTA and OCT imaging were included. Classification performance of a VGG16 CNN trained and tested on entire en face 4.5 × 4.5-mm radial peripapillary capillary OCTA ONH images was compared to the performance of separate GBC models trained and tested on standard OCTA and OCT measurements. Five-fold cross-validation was used to test predictions for CNNs and GBCs. Areas under the precision recall curves (AUPRC) were calculated to control for training/test set size imbalance and were compared.
Results
Adjusted AUPRCs for GBC models were 0.89 (95% CI = 0.82, 0.92) for whole image vessel density GBC, 0.89 (0.83, 0.92) for whole image capillary density GBC, 0.91 (0.88, 0.93) for combined whole image vessel and whole image capillary density GBC, and 0.93 (0.91, 095) for RNFL thickness GBC. The adjusted AUPRC using CNN analysis of en face vessel density images was 0.97 (0.95, 0.99) resulting in significantly improved classification compared to GBC OCTA-based results and GBC OCT-based results (P ≤ 0.01 for all comparisons).
Conclusion
Deep learning en face image analysis improves on feature-based GBC models for classifying healthy and glaucoma eyes.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts3
A VGG16 convolutional neural network (CNN) trained and tested on entire en face 4.5 × 4.5-mm radial peripapillary capillary OCTA ONH images achieved an adjusted AUPRC of 0.97 (95% CI = 0.95, 0.99) for classifying healthy and glaucomatous eyes.
A VGG16 convolutional neural network (CNN) analysis of en face vessel density images resulted in significantly improved classification of healthy and glaucoma eyes compared to gradient boosting classifier (GBC) OCTA-based results and GBC OCT-based results (P ≤ 0.01 for all comparisons), achieving an adjusted AUPRC of 0.97 (0.95, 0.99).
Gradient boosting classifier (GBC) models for classifying healthy and glaucomatous eyes yielded adjusted AUPRCs of 0.89 (95% CI = 0.82, 0.92) for whole image vessel density, 0.89 (0.83, 0.92) for whole image capillary density, 0.91 (0.88, 0.93) for combined whole image vessel and whole image capillary density, and 0.93 (0.91, 0.95) for RNFL thickness.
Related Articles5
Age-related changes in optical coherence tomography glaucoma-related parameters: A systematic review.
Systematic ReviewPredicting Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness From Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Optic Disc Photographs.
Cohort StudyArtificial Intelligence Deep Learning Models to Predict Spaceflight Associated Neuro-Ocular Syndrome.
Observational StudyClinical and histological aspects of the anatomy of myopia, myopic macular degeneration and myopia-associated optic neuropathy.
ReviewLongitudinal OCTA vessel density loss in macula and optic nerve head in healthy, glaucoma suspect and established glaucoma eyes.
Cohort StudyIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.