Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

Am J OphthalmolNovember 202128 citations

Deep Learning Image Analysis of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Measured Vessel Density Improves Classification of Healthy and Glaucoma Eyes.

Bowd Christopher, Belghith Akram, Zangwill Linda M, Christopher Mark, Goldbaum Michael H, Fan Rui, Rezapour Jasmin, Moghimi Sasan, Kamalipour Alireza, Hou Huiyuan


AI Summary

Deep learning analysis of OCTA images significantly improved glaucoma diagnosis compared to traditional methods using OCTA measurements or OCT nerve fiber layer thickness.

Abstract

Purpose

To compare convolutional neural network (CNN) analysis of en face vessel density images to gradient boosting classifier (GBC) analysis of instrument-provided, feature-based optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) vessel density measurements and OCT retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measurements for classifying healthy and glaucomatous eyes.

Design

Comparison of diagnostic approaches.

Methods

A total of 130 eyes of 80 healthy individuals and 275 eyes of 185 glaucoma patients with optic nerve head (ONH) OCTA and OCT imaging were included. Classification performance of a VGG16 CNN trained and tested on entire en face 4.5 × 4.5-mm radial peripapillary capillary OCTA ONH images was compared to the performance of separate GBC models trained and tested on standard OCTA and OCT measurements. Five-fold cross-validation was used to test predictions for CNNs and GBCs. Areas under the precision recall curves (AUPRC) were calculated to control for training/test set size imbalance and were compared.

Results

Adjusted AUPRCs for GBC models were 0.89 (95% CI = 0.82, 0.92) for whole image vessel density GBC, 0.89 (0.83, 0.92) for whole image capillary density GBC, 0.91 (0.88, 0.93) for combined whole image vessel and whole image capillary density GBC, and 0.93 (0.91, 095) for RNFL thickness GBC. The adjusted AUPRC using CNN analysis of en face vessel density images was 0.97 (0.95, 0.99) resulting in significantly improved classification compared to GBC OCTA-based results and GBC OCT-based results (P ≤ 0.01 for all comparisons).

Conclusion

Deep learning en face image analysis improves on feature-based GBC models for classifying healthy and glaucoma eyes.


MeSH Terms

Deep LearningFluorescein AngiographyGlaucomaHumansIntraocular PressureRetinal Ganglion CellsRetinal VesselsTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual Fields

Key Concepts3

A VGG16 convolutional neural network (CNN) trained and tested on entire en face 4.5 × 4.5-mm radial peripapillary capillary OCTA ONH images achieved an adjusted AUPRC of 0.97 (95% CI = 0.95, 0.99) for classifying healthy and glaucomatous eyes.

DiagnosisCohortComparison of diagnostic approachesn=130 eyes of 80 healthy individuals an…Ch1Ch5Ch11

A VGG16 convolutional neural network (CNN) analysis of en face vessel density images resulted in significantly improved classification of healthy and glaucoma eyes compared to gradient boosting classifier (GBC) OCTA-based results and GBC OCT-based results (P ≤ 0.01 for all comparisons), achieving an adjusted AUPRC of 0.97 (0.95, 0.99).

Comparative EffectivenessCohortComparison of diagnostic approachesn=130 eyes of 80 healthy individuals an…Ch1Ch5Ch11

Gradient boosting classifier (GBC) models for classifying healthy and glaucomatous eyes yielded adjusted AUPRCs of 0.89 (95% CI = 0.82, 0.92) for whole image vessel density, 0.89 (0.83, 0.92) for whole image capillary density, 0.91 (0.88, 0.93) for combined whole image vessel and whole image capillary density, and 0.93 (0.91, 0.95) for RNFL thickness.

DiagnosisCohortComparison of diagnostic approachesn=130 eyes of 80 healthy individuals an…Ch1Ch5Ch11

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.