Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

J GlaucomaApril 20213 citations

Variations of Intraocular Pressure Measured by Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Tono-Pen, iCare Rebound Tonometer, and Pascal Dynamic Contour Tonometer in Patients With Corneal Edema After Phacoemulsification.

Kiddee Weerawat, Tanjana Arunee


AI Summary

In eyes with post-phacoemulsification corneal edema, Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) significantly underestimated IOP compared to other tonometers. GAT readings in edematous corneas require cautious interpretation.

Abstract

Prcis: Edematous corneas had lower Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) intraocular pressure (IOP) compared with other tonometers. A significant, mild negative correlation between central corneal thickness (CCT) and GAT IOP was found in a group of significant edematous corneas with CCT increases of >100 µm.

Purpose

To compare the IOP that was randomly obtained with the GAT, Tono-Pen, iCare, and Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in patients with corneal edema after phacoemulsification.

Materials and methods

Corneal edema was quantified by CCT measurement. The agreement between IOP measurements assessed by different instruments was evaluated using Bland-Altman plots. The relationship between CCT and IOP was investigated using the coefficient of correlation. The CCT and IOP were compared between the periods of postsurgical edema and after its resolution.

Results

The mean age of 60 patients was 75.9±7.8 years. CCT increased significantly after surgery, by an average of 96.1±39.9 µm (P<0.001). Relative to the IOPs measured with the GAT in edematous eyes: the mean difference in Tono-Pen IOPs was 4.7 mm Hg; 95% limits of agreement (LOA), -0.3 to 9.6 mm Hg. For iCare, was 2.3 mm Hg; 95% LOA, -2.2 to 6.8 mm Hg. For Pascal dynamic contour tonometer, was 3.0 mm Hg; 95% LOA, -0.4 to 6.5 mm Hg. Edematous corneas had significantly lower GAT IOP than Tono-Pen IOP; 12.3±3.2 versus 16.9±3.1 (P=0.02). Pearson correlation coefficients (r) showed a high correlation between the 4 tonometers in eyes without edema. There was a significant, mild negative correlation between CCT and GAT IOP (r=-0.25, P=0.02) in a group of significant edematous corneas with CCT increases of >100 µm: GAT IOP decreased by 3.1 mm Hg for every 10-µm increase in CCT.

Conclusions

IOP readings with GAT tended to be lower than those obtained with the other tonometers, especially the Tono-Pen. GAT IOP readings in cases of severe corneal edema should be interpreted with caution.


MeSH Terms

AgedAged, 80 and overCorneaCorneal EdemaHumansIntraocular PressurePhacoemulsificationReproducibility of ResultsTonometry, Ocular

Key Concepts6

Edematous corneas had significantly lower Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) intraocular pressure (IOP) readings (12.3±3.2 mm Hg) compared to Tono-Pen IOP readings (16.9±3.1 mm Hg) in patients with corneal edema after phacoemulsification (P=0.02).

Comparative EffectivenessCohortProspective Cohort Studyn=60 patientsCh3Ch26

A significant, mild negative correlation was found between central corneal thickness (CCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) intraocular pressure (IOP) (r=-0.25, P=0.02) in a group of significant edematous corneas with CCT increases of >100 µm in patients after phacoemulsification.

MechanismCohortProspective Cohort Studyn=60 patientsCh3Ch26

For every 10-µm increase in central corneal thickness (CCT), Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) intraocular pressure (IOP) decreased by 3.1 mm Hg in a group of significant edematous corneas with CCT increases of >100 µm in patients after phacoemulsification.

MechanismCohortProspective Cohort Studyn=60 patientsCh3Ch26

In patients with corneal edema after phacoemulsification, the mean difference in Tono-Pen intraocular pressure (IOP) compared to Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) IOP was 4.7 mm Hg (95% limits of agreement, -0.3 to 9.6 mm Hg).

Comparative EffectivenessCohortProspective Cohort Studyn=60 patientsCh3Ch26

In patients with corneal edema after phacoemulsification, the mean difference in iCare rebound tonometer intraocular pressure (IOP) compared to Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) IOP was 2.3 mm Hg (95% limits of agreement, -2.2 to 6.8 mm Hg).

Comparative EffectivenessCohortProspective Cohort Studyn=60 patientsCh3Ch26

In patients with corneal edema after phacoemulsification, the mean difference in Pascal dynamic contour tonometer intraocular pressure (IOP) compared to Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) IOP was 3.0 mm Hg (95% limits of agreement, -0.4 to 6.5 mm Hg).

Comparative EffectivenessCohortProspective Cohort Studyn=60 patientsCh3Ch26

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.