Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

Surv OphthalmolDecember 20228 citations

Prophylactic intraocular pressure lowering measures in anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Arjmand Parnian, Yu Caberry W, Popovic Marko M, Jhaveri Aaditeya, Mandelcorn Efrem D


AI Summary

This meta-analysis found anterior chamber paracentesis during anti-VEGF injections significantly reduces immediate IOP spikes and preserves retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, highlighting its protective role.

Abstract

Acute intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation following repeat intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections (IVI) may pose a risk to the integrity of the retinal nerve fiber (RNFL). This meta-analysis investigates the role of IOP-lowering interventions such as an anterior chamber paracentesis (ACP) and IOP-lowering medications on the IOP in patients undergoing IVIs. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched up to February, 2021. Studies investigating IOP-lowering interventions in patients undergoing IVI versus controls were included. The primary outcome was the IOP in the short- and long-term post-IVI. Secondary outcomes were changes in the RNFL thickness and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). ACP at time of anti-VEGF injection significantly lowered IOP immediately post anti-VEGF (WMD: -27.98 mm Hg, P < 0.001). Patients in the ACP group also had significantly thicker RNFL compared to control (WMD: 2.07 um, P < 0.00001) at median follow-up of 16.5 months. IOP-lowering medications (on the day of injection or in the long-term) significantly reduced IOP up to 30 minutes after injection (WMD: -3.31 mm Hg, P = 0.003). This effect was statistically significant between the 2 arms up to 1 month follow-up. There was no difference in BCVA in intervention versus controls. ACP reduces immediate IOP spikes post-IVI and preserves the RNFL in the short- and longterms IOP-lowering medications also reduce IOP spike, with limited data on RNFL thickness.


MeSH Terms

HumansIntraocular PressureEndothelial Growth FactorsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor ATonometry, OcularOcular HypertensionIntravitreal InjectionsAngiogenesis InhibitorsRanibizumabBevacizumab

Key Concepts4

Anterior chamber paracentesis (ACP) at the time of anti-VEGF injection significantly lowered intraocular pressure (IOP) immediately post anti-VEGF (WMD: -27.98 mm Hg, P < 0.001) in a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies investigating IOP-lowering interventions in patients undergoing intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections (IVI) versus controls.

TreatmentMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review and Meta-Analysisn=Studies investigating IOP-lowering in…Ch28Ch38

Patients who received anterior chamber paracentesis (ACP) at the time of anti-VEGF injection had significantly thicker retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) compared to control (WMD: 2.07 um, P < 0.00001) at a median follow-up of 16.5 months, as found in a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PrognosisMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review and Meta-Analysisn=Studies investigating IOP-lowering in…Ch5Ch28

IOP-lowering medications (on the day of injection or in the long-term) significantly reduced intraocular pressure (IOP) up to 30 minutes after intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections (WMD: -3.31 mm Hg, P = 0.003), with this effect being statistically significant between the 2 arms up to 1 month follow-up, in a systematic review and meta-analysis.

TreatmentMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review and Meta-Analysisn=Studies investigating IOP-lowering in…Ch28Ch29

There was no difference in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between intervention (anterior chamber paracentesis or IOP-lowering medications) and control groups in patients undergoing intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections, according to a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Comparative EffectivenessMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review and Meta-Analysisn=Studies investigating IOP-lowering in…Ch7Ch28

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.