Short-term intraocular pressure changes after intravitreal aflibercept 2 mg, aflibercept 8 mg and faricimab: a prospective, comparative study.
Paris Arianna, Volpe Giulio, Perruchoud-Ader Kathrin, Casanova Alex, Menghini Moreno, Grimaldi Gabriela
AI Summary
This study found all anti-VEGF injections cause a transient IOP spike that normalizes within 15 minutes, with faricimab showing a slightly lower initial peak, but overall similar profiles across agents.
Abstract
Background/aims: Intravitreal injection (IVT) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents is the standard of care for several retinal diseases but can cause intraocular pressure (IOP) elevations. This study investigates short-term postinjection IOP changes following aflibercept 8 mg and faricimab, compared with aflibercept 2 mg.
Methods
This observational, prospective study included 90 patients with age-related macular degeneration or diabetic macular oedema, divided into three groups, receiving aflibercept 2 mg, aflibercept 8 mg or faricimab. IOP was measured using an iCare IC200-tonometer preinjection (T0) and at 30 s (T1), 5 min (T2) and 15 min (T3) postinjection. Primary outcomes included IOP changes at the four time points within and between treatment groups. The incidence of transient visual loss requiring paracentesis was recorded.
Results
All groups experienced a significant IOP increase at T1, with mean IOP increase being 41.47±12.95 mm Hg for aflibercept 2 mg, 43.46±8.97 mm Hg for aflibercept 8 mg and 32.19±11.06 mm Hg for faricimab. By T2, IOP differences were not significant, and by T3, mean IOP returned within normal limits across all groups. Faricimab showed a smaller initial IOP spike than both aflibercept formulations, but this difference was not statistically significant at T2 and T3.
Conclusion
Transient IOP spikes are observed post-IVT of aflibercept 8 mg and faricimab, with similar trends to aflibercept 2 mg. The initial IOP elevation normalised within 15 min. Faricimab had a lower initial spike, but overall IOP profiles were comparable across different agents.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts5
All groups receiving intravitreal aflibercept 2 mg, aflibercept 8 mg, or faricimab experienced a significant intraocular pressure (IOP) increase at 30 seconds post-injection (T1), with mean IOP increases of 41.47±12.95 mm Hg for aflibercept 2 mg, 43.46±8.97 mm Hg for aflibercept 8 mg, and 32.19±11.06 mm Hg for faricimab.
By 15 minutes post-intravitreal injection (T3), mean intraocular pressure (IOP) returned within normal limits across all groups receiving aflibercept 2 mg, aflibercept 8 mg, or faricimab.
Faricimab showed a smaller initial intraocular pressure (IOP) spike than both aflibercept 2 mg and aflibercept 8 mg formulations immediately post-intravitreal injection, but this difference was not statistically significant at 5 minutes (T2) and 15 minutes (T3) post-injection.
Transient intraocular pressure (IOP) spikes are observed post-intravitreal injection of aflibercept 8 mg and faricimab, with similar trends to aflibercept 2 mg.
Intravitreal injection (IVT) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents can cause intraocular pressure (IOP) elevations.
Related Articles5
Prophylactic intraocular pressure lowering measures in anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Systematic ReviewIntraocular pressure effect of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection for aggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity.
Cohort StudyIntraocular pressure decreases in eyes with glaucoma-related diagnoses after conversion to aflibercept for treatment-resistant age-related macular degeneration.
Case SeriesIntraocular Pressure Changes and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Inhibitor Use in Various Retinal Diseases: Long-Term Outcomes in Routine Clinical Practice: Data from the Fight Retinal Blindness! Registry.
Observational StudyThe Effect of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Agents on Intraocular Pressure and Glaucoma: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Systematic ReviewIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.