Short-term safety and efficacy of Preserflo™ Microshunt in glaucoma patients: a multicentre retrospective cohort study.
Bhayani Raj, Martínez de la Casa Jose Maria, Figus Michele, Klabe Karsten, Rabiolo Alessandro, Mercieca Karl
AI Summary
The Preserflo Microshunt effectively lowered IOP and medication use in glaucoma patients over one year, showing good safety but modest success for very low target pressures, guiding surgical selection.
Abstract
Background/aims: To evaluate 1-year success rates and safety profile of Preserflo™ Microshunt in glaucoma patients.
Methods
Retrospective multicentre cohort study of 100 consecutive eyes (91 patients) from four tertiary-referral glaucoma centres. Four intraocular pressure (IOP) criteria were defined: A: IOP ≤ 21 mmHg+IOP reduction ≥20% from baseline; B: IOP ≤ 18 mmHg+IOP reduction ≥20%; C: IOP ≤ 15 mmHg+IOP reduction ≥25%; D: IOP≤12 mmHg+IOP reduction ≥30%. Success was defined as qualified or complete based on whether reached with or without medication. Primary outcome was success according to the above criteria. Secondary outcomes included: IOP, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), medication use, complications, postoperative interventions, and failure-associated factors.
Results
Qualified and complete success rates (95% CI) at 12 months were 74%(66-83%) and 58%(49-69%) for criterion A, 72%(63-82%) and 57%(48-68%) for B, 52%(43-63%) and 47%(38-58%) for C, 29%(21-40%) and 26%(19-36%) for D. Overall median (interquartile range (IQR)) preoperative IOP decreased from 21.5(19-28) mmHg to 13(11-16) mmHg at 12 months. BCVA was not significantly different up to 12 months (p = 0.79). Preoperative median (IQR) number of medications decreased from 3 (2-3) to 0 (0-1) at 12 months. Twelve eyes underwent needling, five surgical revision and one device removal due to corneal oedema. There were no hypotony-related complications. Non-Caucasian ethnicity was the only risk factor consistently associated with increased failure.
Conclusions
Preserflo™ Microshunt is a viable surgical option in glaucoma patients, with reasonable short-term success rates, decreased medications use, excellent safety profile, smooth postoperative care, and rapid learning curve. Success rates for the most stringent IOP cutoffs were modest, indicating that it may not be the optimal surgery when very low target IOP is required.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts5
In a multicentre retrospective cohort study of 100 consecutive eyes (91 patients), the qualified success rate for Preserflo™ Microshunt at 12 months was 74% (66-83%) for criterion A (IOP ≤ 21 mmHg + IOP reduction ≥ 20% from baseline).
In a multicentre retrospective cohort study of 100 consecutive eyes (91 patients), the complete success rate for Preserflo™ Microshunt at 12 months was 58% (49-69%) for criterion A (IOP ≤ 21 mmHg + IOP reduction ≥ 20% from baseline).
In a multicentre retrospective cohort study of 100 consecutive eyes (91 patients) undergoing Preserflo™ Microshunt surgery, the overall median (interquartile range (IQR)) preoperative IOP decreased from 21.5 (19-28) mmHg to 13 (11-16) mmHg at 12 months.
In a multicentre retrospective cohort study of 100 consecutive eyes (91 patients) undergoing Preserflo™ Microshunt surgery, the preoperative median (IQR) number of medications decreased from 3 (2-3) to 0 (0-1) at 12 months.
In a multicentre retrospective cohort study of 100 consecutive eyes (91 patients) undergoing Preserflo™ Microshunt surgery, non-Caucasian ethnicity was identified as the only risk factor consistently associated with increased failure.
Related Articles5
The Paul Glaucoma Implant: a systematic review of safety, efficacy, and emerging applications.
Systematic ReviewEvaluating High Intraocular Pressure Criteria for Failure in Glaucoma Surgery: Impact on Estimated Success and Visual Field Rates.
Systematic ReviewPreserFlo MicroShunt versus trabeculectomy: an updated meta-analysis and systematic review.
Meta-AnalysisLong-term comparative outcomes of Hydrus versus iStent inject microinvasive glaucoma surgery implants combined with cataract surgery.
Observational StudyAhmed and baerveldt in glaucoma surgery: what is the safest choice? - a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Meta-AnalysisIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.