MNREAD Reading Vision in Adults With Glaucoma Under Mesopic and Photopic Conditions.
Goddin Traci-Lin, Yu Haojue, Friedman David S, Owsley Cynthia, Kwon MiYoung
AI Summary
This study found glaucoma patients have significantly worse reading vision in dim light than healthy individuals, highlighting the need for mesopic testing to better assess real-world visual impairment.
Abstract
Purpose
Despite good photopic visual acuity, glaucoma patients report difficulty performing daily activities under dim light such as reading. Here we investigated the impact of mesopic lighting conditions on reading vision of glaucoma patients.
Methods
The study design included 39 patients with glaucoma and 40 healthy controls. Reading vision was assessed with MNREAD charts under mesopic (2 cd/m2) and photopic (220 cd/m2) conditions. Four reading indexes: maximum reading speed (MRS), critical print size (CPS), reading acuity (RA), and reading accessibility index (ACC) were obtained from the MNREAD test yielding a plot of reading speed versus print size.
Results
Compared to photopic conditions, reading vision of both healthy controls and glaucoma patients significantly decreased under mesopic conditions (P < 0.05). For glaucoma patients (85% with mild or moderate glaucoma), MRS and ACC decreased by six words per minute and 0.1, respectively under mesopic conditions; CPS and RA increased by 0.25 and 0.18 logMAR, respectively. Moreover, under both photopic and mesopic conditions, reading vision of glaucoma patients was significantly worse than that of healthy controls, but the difference was greater under mesopic conditions (P < 0.05) even after controlling for age and visual acuity.
Conclusions
Mesopic conditions make reading more challenging for both healthy controls and glaucoma patients. However, reading in dim light appears to be more burdensome for glaucoma patients. Mesopic reading tests mediated by both cone and rod photoreceptor systems likely provide a more sensitive and comprehensive assessment of a patient's reading impairment than testing under photopic conditions.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts5
Reading vision of both healthy controls and glaucoma patients significantly decreased under mesopic conditions (2 cd/m2) compared to photopic conditions (220 cd/m2) (P < 0.05).
For glaucoma patients (85% with mild or moderate glaucoma), maximum reading speed (MRS) and reading accessibility index (ACC) decreased by six words per minute and 0.1, respectively, under mesopic conditions compared to photopic conditions.
For glaucoma patients (85% with mild or moderate glaucoma), critical print size (CPS) and reading acuity (RA) increased by 0.25 and 0.18 logMAR, respectively, under mesopic conditions compared to photopic conditions.
Under both photopic and mesopic conditions, reading vision of glaucoma patients was significantly worse than that of healthy controls, and this difference was greater under mesopic conditions (P < 0.05) even after controlling for age and visual acuity.
Mesopic reading tests, mediated by both cone and rod photoreceptor systems, likely provide a more sensitive and comprehensive assessment of a patient's reading impairment than testing under photopic conditions for glaucoma patients.
Related Articles5
Global estimates on the number of people blind or visually impaired by glaucoma: A meta-analysis from 2000 to 2020.
Meta-AnalysisDiagnosis of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Mental Health Status.
Cohort StudyIndividuals with severe visual field loss from stroke and glaucoma could have on-road driving safety comparable to normally sighted drivers.
Observational StudyImportance of Screening for Contrast Sensitivity, Falls, and Mobility Limitations in Older Adults With Maculopathy.
Cross-Sectional StudyGlaucoma and Risk of Fractures: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Network Meta-Analysis.
Systematic ReviewIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.