Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

Invest Ophthalmol Vis SciDecember 20234 citations

MNREAD Reading Vision in Adults With Glaucoma Under Mesopic and Photopic Conditions.

Goddin Traci-Lin, Yu Haojue, Friedman David S, Owsley Cynthia, Kwon MiYoung


AI Summary

This study found glaucoma patients have significantly worse reading vision in dim light than healthy individuals, highlighting the need for mesopic testing to better assess real-world visual impairment.

Abstract

Purpose

Despite good photopic visual acuity, glaucoma patients report difficulty performing daily activities under dim light such as reading. Here we investigated the impact of mesopic lighting conditions on reading vision of glaucoma patients.

Methods

The study design included 39 patients with glaucoma and 40 healthy controls. Reading vision was assessed with MNREAD charts under mesopic (2 cd/m2) and photopic (220 cd/m2) conditions. Four reading indexes: maximum reading speed (MRS), critical print size (CPS), reading acuity (RA), and reading accessibility index (ACC) were obtained from the MNREAD test yielding a plot of reading speed versus print size.

Results

Compared to photopic conditions, reading vision of both healthy controls and glaucoma patients significantly decreased under mesopic conditions (P < 0.05). For glaucoma patients (85% with mild or moderate glaucoma), MRS and ACC decreased by six words per minute and 0.1, respectively under mesopic conditions; CPS and RA increased by 0.25 and 0.18 logMAR, respectively. Moreover, under both photopic and mesopic conditions, reading vision of glaucoma patients was significantly worse than that of healthy controls, but the difference was greater under mesopic conditions (P < 0.05) even after controlling for age and visual acuity.

Conclusions

Mesopic conditions make reading more challenging for both healthy controls and glaucoma patients. However, reading in dim light appears to be more burdensome for glaucoma patients. Mesopic reading tests mediated by both cone and rod photoreceptor systems likely provide a more sensitive and comprehensive assessment of a patient's reading impairment than testing under photopic conditions.


MeSH Terms

AdultHumansReadingColor VisionRetinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsGlaucomaLighting

Key Concepts5

Reading vision of both healthy controls and glaucoma patients significantly decreased under mesopic conditions (2 cd/m2) compared to photopic conditions (220 cd/m2) (P < 0.05).

PrognosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=39 patients with glaucoma and 40 heal…Ch6Ch7

For glaucoma patients (85% with mild or moderate glaucoma), maximum reading speed (MRS) and reading accessibility index (ACC) decreased by six words per minute and 0.1, respectively, under mesopic conditions compared to photopic conditions.

PrognosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=39 patients with glaucomaCh6Ch7

For glaucoma patients (85% with mild or moderate glaucoma), critical print size (CPS) and reading acuity (RA) increased by 0.25 and 0.18 logMAR, respectively, under mesopic conditions compared to photopic conditions.

PrognosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=39 patients with glaucomaCh6Ch7

Under both photopic and mesopic conditions, reading vision of glaucoma patients was significantly worse than that of healthy controls, and this difference was greater under mesopic conditions (P < 0.05) even after controlling for age and visual acuity.

PrognosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=39 patients with glaucoma and 40 heal…Ch6Ch7

Mesopic reading tests, mediated by both cone and rod photoreceptor systems, likely provide a more sensitive and comprehensive assessment of a patient's reading impairment than testing under photopic conditions for glaucoma patients.

DiagnosisExpert OpinionCross-sectional studyn=39 patients with glaucoma and 40 heal…Ch6Ch7Ch28

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.