Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

J GlaucomaFebruary 20236 citations

Outcomes of Ultrasound Cyclo Plasty in Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma.

Almobarak Faisal A, Alrubean Ahmed, Alsarhani Waleed K, Aljenaidel Abdullah, Osman Essam A


AI Summary

UCP effectively lowers IOP and medication burden in PACG for up to two years, but high baseline IOP predicts failure and patients need counseling on potential complications like cataract progression.

Abstract

Prcis: Ultrasound cyclo plasty (UCP) can be useful in decreasing the intraocular pressure (IOP) and burden of antiglaucoma medications in eyes with primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG). Nevertheless, baselines IOP was an important determinant for failure.

Purpose

To evaluate the intermediate-term outcomes of UCP in PACG.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included patients with PACG who underwent UCP. The main outcome measures were IOP, number of antiglaucoma medications, visual acuity, and presence of complications. The surgical outcomes of each eye were classified as a complete success, qualified success, or failure based on the main outcome measures. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify possible predictors for failure.

Results

Sixty-two eyes of 56 patients were included in the study. The mean follow-up period was 28.81 months (±18.2). The IOP and number of antiglaucoma medications decreased from a mean of 23.03 (±6.4) mmHg and 3.42 (±0.9) to 15.57 (±6.4) mmHg and 2.04 (±1.3), respectively, in the 12 th month and to 14.22 (±5.0) mmHg and 1.91 (±1.5) in the 24 th month ( P <0.01 for all). The cumulative probabilities of overall success were 72.6±5.7% and 54.8±6.3% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. A high baseline IOP was associated with a higher risk of failure (hazard ratio=1.10, P =0.03). The most common complications were cataract development or progression (30.6%), rebound or prolonged anterior chamber reaction (8.1%), hypotony with choroidal detachment (3.2%), and phthisis bulbi (3.2%).

Conclusions

UCP offers reasonable 2-year IOP control and reduction of the antiglaucoma medication burden. However, counseling on possible postoperative complications is needed.


MeSH Terms

HumansIntraocular PressureGlaucoma, Angle-ClosureAntiglaucoma AgentsRetrospective StudiesGlaucomaTreatment OutcomeFollow-Up Studies

Key Concepts6

Ultrasound cyclo plasty (UCP) can be useful in decreasing the intraocular pressure (IOP) and burden of antiglaucoma medications in eyes with primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG).

TreatmentCohortRetrospective Cohort Studyn=62 eyes of 56 patientsCh44

In eyes with primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) undergoing Ultrasound cyclo plasty (UCP), the mean IOP decreased from 23.03 (±6.4) mmHg to 15.57 (±6.4) mmHg at 12 months and to 14.22 (±5.0) mmHg at 24 months (P <0.01 for all).

TreatmentCohortRetrospective Cohort Studyn=62 eyes of 56 patientsCh44

In eyes with primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) undergoing Ultrasound cyclo plasty (UCP), the number of antiglaucoma medications decreased from a mean of 3.42 (±0.9) to 2.04 (±1.3) at 12 months and to 1.91 (±1.5) at 24 months (P <0.01 for all).

TreatmentCohortRetrospective Cohort Studyn=62 eyes of 56 patientsCh44

The cumulative probabilities of overall success for Ultrasound cyclo plasty (UCP) in primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) were 72.6±5.7% at 12 months and 54.8±6.3% at 24 months.

PrognosisCohortRetrospective Cohort Studyn=62 eyes of 56 patientsCh44

A high baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) was associated with a higher risk of failure for Ultrasound cyclo plasty (UCP) in primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) (hazard ratio=1.10, P =0.03).

PrognosisCohortRetrospective Cohort Studyn=62 eyes of 56 patientsCh44

The most common complications of Ultrasound cyclo plasty (UCP) in primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) were cataract development or progression (30.6%), rebound or prolonged anterior chamber reaction (8.1%), hypotony with choroidal detachment (3.2%), and phthisis bulbi (3.2%).

PrognosisCohortRetrospective Cohort Studyn=62 eyes of 56 patientsCh44

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.