Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

Invest Ophthalmol Vis SciDecember 20240 citations

Change in Systemic Medication and its Influence on Intraocular Pressure - Results From the Gutenberg Health Study.

Laspas Panagiotis, Hartmann Alica, Scholz Ida, Hoffmann Esther Maria, Khawaja Anthony P, Lackner Karl Johannes, Münzel Thomas, Kerahrodi Jasmin Ghaemi, Schmidtmann Irene, Tüscher Oliver


AI Summary

This study found systemic selective beta-blocker changes significantly impact IOP. Clinically, routinely ask patients about systemic medication changes to better manage glaucoma.

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the change in systemic medication and intraocular pressure (IOP) on a population-based level.

Methods

The Gutenberg Health Study is a population-based prospective observational cohort study in Germany. As part of the baseline examination (2007-2012) and 5-year follow-up examination (2012-2017), IOP was measured by non-contact tonometry. Systemic medication was recorded at both time points. Multivariable regression analyses were carried out to analyze associations. Moreover, we calculated the dose-response relationship for the dosage change of selective beta-blockers with IOP change over 5 years.

Results

The analysis population included 19,161 eyes of 9633 participants. IOP change was lower in participants with new intake of selective beta-blockers (-0.31 mm Hg, P < 0.001) and increased in those with discontinuation of selective beta-blocker intake (+0.28 mm Hg, P = 0.02). Associations between IOP change and statins and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) could be attributed to co-medications. There was a dose-response relationship for change in selective beta-blocker intake and change in IOP (-0.16 mm Hg/100 mg, P = 0.02).

Conclusions

Use of systemic selective beta-blockers is associated with an IOP change on a population level, whereas the association with other systemic medications on IOP change could be explained by co-medication use or change in blood pressure. Patients undergoing IOP monitoring and management should routinely be asked about changes in systemic medications.


MeSH Terms

HumansIntraocular PressureFemaleMaleProspective StudiesMiddle AgedGermanyTonometry, OcularAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAgedFollow-Up StudiesAntihypertensive AgentsCalcium Channel BlockersHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsAdultDose-Response Relationship, Drug

Key Concepts5

The change in intraocular pressure (IOP) was lower by -0.31 mm Hg (P < 0.001) in participants with new intake of systemic selective beta-blockers, based on a population-based prospective observational cohort study in Germany.

TreatmentCohortProspective Cohort Studyn=19,161 eyes of 9633 participantsCh3Ch10Ch29

The change in intraocular pressure (IOP) increased by +0.28 mm Hg (P = 0.02) in participants who discontinued systemic selective beta-blocker intake, based on a population-based prospective observational cohort study in Germany.

TreatmentCohortProspective Cohort Studyn=19,161 eyes of 9633 participantsCh3Ch10Ch29

There was a dose-response relationship for the change in systemic selective beta-blocker intake and change in intraocular pressure (IOP) of -0.16 mm Hg/100 mg (P = 0.02) over 5 years, in a population-based prospective observational cohort study in Germany.

TreatmentCohortProspective Cohort Studyn=19,161 eyes of 9633 participantsCh3Ch10Ch29

Associations between intraocular pressure (IOP) change and systemic statins and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) could be attributed to co-medications, in a population-based prospective observational cohort study in Germany.

TreatmentCohortProspective Cohort Studyn=19,161 eyes of 9633 participantsCh3Ch10

The Gutenberg Health Study is a population-based prospective observational cohort study in Germany that collected intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements by non-contact tonometry and systemic medication at baseline (2007-2012) and 5-year follow-up (2012-2017).

MethodologyCohortProspective Observational Cohort Studyn=9633 participantsCh10

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.