Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

Eye (Lond)October 20246 citations

Factors associated with vision loss in idiopathic intracranial hypertension patients with severe papilledema.

Bouthour Walid, Bruce Beau B, Newman Nancy J, Biousse Valérie


AI Summary

This study found that severe IIH patients with poor vision had higher BMI and delayed neuro-ophthalmology care due to initial ED visits, highlighting the need for early specialized evaluation.

Abstract

Background/objectives: Our aim was to compare factors associated with poor versus good visual outcomes in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) patients with severe papilledema at initial presentation.

Subjects/Methods

Retrospective review of consecutive IIH patients (1/1/2013-6/10/2023) with severe papilledema (Frisén grade 4-5 and/or atrophy in at least one eye); Patients were divided into "poor visual outcome" (poor visual acuity and constricted visual field in at least one eye) and "good visual outcome" (good visual acuity and only mild visual field changes in both eyes) at >6 months for medically-treated patients and >3 months follow-up for surgically-treated patients.

Results

We included 134 IIH patients with severe papilledema (70 had poor and 64 had good visual outcomes). No significant differences existed for age, gender, race, hypertension, haemoglobin, or cerebrospinal fluid opening pressure. The poor-outcome group had significantly greater BMI (mean 39.2 vs 35.1 kg/m 2 , p = 0.004), and worse initial HVF-MD (-20.04 vs -5.81 dB, p < 0.0001). Poor-outcome patients saw more prior health-care providers (4.7 vs 2.4, p < 0.0001), with delayed neuro-ophthalmology encounters (58.5 vs 15.2 weeks, p = 0.001). 41.4% of poor-outcome patients were initially seen in outside emergency departments (ED) (vs 14.1% of good-outcome patients, p = 0.0005), while only 27.1% were seen by eye-care providers (vs 53.1% of good-outcome patients, p = 0.0027). No poor-outcome patients initially consulted our institution's ED vs 7.8% of good-outcome patients.

Conclusions

Although patients with poor visual outcome did not seek medical care later than good outcome patients, they had delayed diagnosis/treatment because of prior outside ED visits and lack of prior eye-care provider evaluations, suggesting that early diagnosis and specialized management of papilledema is essential for patients with symptoms of intracranial hypertension.


MeSH Terms

HumansPapilledemaRetrospective StudiesMaleFemaleAdultVisual AcuityPseudotumor CerebriVisual FieldsMiddle AgedVision DisordersYoung AdultRisk Factors

Key Concepts4

In a retrospective review of 134 idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) patients with severe papilledema, the poor visual outcome group had a significantly greater BMI (mean 39.2 vs 35.1 kg/m2, p = 0.004) and worse initial HVF-MD (-20.04 vs -5.81 dB, p < 0.0001) compared to the good visual outcome group.

PrognosisCohortRetrospective Cohort Studyn=134 IIH patientsCh5Ch6Ch7

In a retrospective review of 134 idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) patients with severe papilledema, patients with poor visual outcomes saw more prior health-care providers (4.7 vs 2.4, p < 0.0001) and experienced delayed neuro-ophthalmology encounters (58.5 vs 15.2 weeks, p = 0.001) compared to patients with good visual outcomes.

PrognosisCohortRetrospective Cohort Studyn=134 IIH patientsCh10Ch28

In a retrospective review of 134 idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) patients with severe papilledema, 41.4% of poor-outcome patients were initially seen in outside emergency departments (ED) (vs 14.1% of good-outcome patients, p = 0.0005), while only 27.1% were seen by eye-care providers (vs 53.1% of good-outcome patients, p = 0.0027).

PrognosisCohortRetrospective Cohort Studyn=134 IIH patientsCh10Ch28

A retrospective review of consecutive idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) patients (1/1/2013-6/10/2023) with severe papilledema (Frisén grade 4-5 and/or atrophy in at least one eye) was conducted to compare factors associated with poor versus good visual outcomes.

MethodologyCohortRetrospective Cohort Studyn=Consecutive IIH patients from 1/1/201…Ch10

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.