Archetypal analysis quantifies changes in patterns of visual field loss in eyes with acute non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy.
Szanto David, Woods Brian, Wang Jui-Kai, Wall Michael, Elze Tobias, Kupersmith Mark
AI Summary
Archetypal analysis revealed distinct visual field loss patterns in NAION, showing global loss increases over time and greater severity in Asian individuals, improving disease characterization and prognosis.
Abstract
Aims
We characterised visual field (VF) spatial loss patterns in acute non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION) using archetypal analysis (AA).
Methods
We performed standard automated perimetry on 727 participants with acute NAION at screening, day 1 of enrolment, months 2, 6 and 12. We applied AA, an unsupervised machine learning technique, to identify and quantify distinct VF loss patterns (archetypes, ATs). We used Mann-Whitney U tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests to assess demographic differences and longitudinal changes in discrete variables, and linear regression to analyse continuous variables.
Results
AA identified 10 distinct ATs, with three especially prevalent patterns: global VF loss (AT1), inferior altitudinal loss (AT2) and inferior altitudinal with macular sparing (AT3). Between day 1 and month 2, AT1 RW significantly increased from 15.7% to 28.1% (false discovery rate, FDR-adjusted p<0.001). Asian participants consistently exhibited greater RW for AT1 compared with White participants (day 1: 40.7% vs 17.7%; FDR-adjusted p<0.001). Sex differences emerged modestly at months 2 and 6, with females having a higher RW for superior altitudinal loss (FDR-adjusted p=0.049). Older participants showed slightly greater frequency of central horizontal and mild central depression patterns (FDR-adjusted p<0.001).
Conclusions
AA effectively quantifies distinct, clinically significant VF spatial loss patterns in NAION, revealing significant temporal changes and demographic differences. Global VF loss represents the predominant AT, increasing notably within 2 months of disease onset. Prominent racial disparities, particularly higher severity in Asian individuals, underscore potential differences in NAION aetiology or susceptibility. These findings provide a foundation for improved disease characterisation and prognosis.
Shields Classification
Key Concepts4
Archetypal analysis (AA) identified 10 distinct visual field (VF) loss patterns in 727 participants with acute non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION), with global VF loss (AT1), inferior altitudinal loss (AT2), and inferior altitudinal with macular sparing (AT3) being especially prevalent.
In 727 participants with acute non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION), the prevalence of global visual field (VF) loss (AT1) significantly increased from 15.7% at day 1 to 28.1% at month 2 (false discovery rate, FDR-adjusted p<0.001).
Asian participants with acute non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION) consistently exhibited a greater relative weight (RW) for global visual field (VF) loss (AT1) compared with White participants (day 1: 40.7% vs 17.7%; FDR-adjusted p<0.001) in a study of 727 participants.
Older participants with acute non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION) showed a slightly greater frequency of central horizontal and mild central depression visual field loss patterns (FDR-adjusted p<0.001) in a study of 727 participants.
Related Articles5
Factors associated with vision loss in idiopathic intracranial hypertension patients with severe papilledema.
Cohort StudyOptic Disc Microvasculature Reduction and Visual Field Progression in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.
Case SeriesShort-Term Deterioration of Visual Acuity and Visual Fields in Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy.
Case SeriesA Decrease in Bruch's Membrane Opening-Minimum Rim Area Precedes Decreased Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness and Visual Field Loss in Glaucoma.
Cross-Sectional StudyCharacteristics of Central Visual Field Progression in Eyes with Optic Disc Hemorrhage.
Cohort StudyIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.