Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

Invest Ophthalmol Vis SciSeptember 20244 citations

Using Multi-Layer Perceptron Driven Diagnosis to Compare Biomarkers for Primary Open Angle Glaucoma.

Riina Nicholas, Harris Alon, Siesky Brent A, Ritzer Lukas, Pasquale Louis R, Tsai James C, Keller James, Wirostko Barbara, Arciero Julia, Fry Brendan


AI Summary

AI models found OCTA vascular biomarkers are as effective as OCT structural biomarkers for diagnosing primary open-angle glaucoma, offering new diagnostic avenues.

Abstract

Purpose

To use neural network machine learning (ML) models to identify the most relevant ocular biomarkers for the diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).

Methods

Neural network models, also known as multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs), were trained on a prospectively collected observational dataset comprised of 93 glaucoma patients confirmed by a glaucoma specialist and 113 control subjects. The base model used only intraocular pressure, blood pressure, heart rate, and visual field (VF) parameters to diagnose glaucoma. The following models were given the base parameters in addition to one of the following biomarkers: structural features (optic nerve parameters, retinal nerve fiber layer [RNFL], ganglion cell complex [GCC] and macular thickness), choroidal thickness, and RNFL and GCC thickness only, by optical coherence tomography (OCT); and vascular features by OCT angiography (OCTA).

Results

MLPs of three different structures were evaluated with tenfold cross validation. The testing area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the models were compared with independent samples t-tests. The vascular and structural models both had significantly higher accuracies than the base model, with the hemodynamic AUC (0.819) insignificantly outperforming the structural set AUC (0.816). The GCC + RNFL model and the model containing all structural and vascular features were also significantly more accurate than the base model.

Conclusions

Neural network models indicate that OCTA optic nerve head vascular biomarkers are equally useful for ML diagnosis of POAG when compared to OCT structural biomarker features alone.


MeSH Terms

HumansGlaucoma, Open-AngleTomography, Optical CoherenceMaleFemaleRetinal Ganglion CellsIntraocular PressureMiddle AgedBiomarkersProspective StudiesNerve FibersVisual FieldsAgedROC CurveNeural Networks, ComputerOptic DiskArea Under Curve

Key Concepts5

Neural network models incorporating vascular features by OCT angiography (OCTA) and structural features (optic nerve parameters, retinal nerve fiber layer [RNFL], ganglion cell complex [GCC], and macular thickness by OCT) both had significantly higher accuracies than the base model for diagnosing primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).

DiagnosisCohortProspective Observational Studyn=93 glaucoma patients, 113 control sub…Ch4Ch5Ch12

The hemodynamic AUC (0.819) for diagnosing primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) using neural network models was insignificantly different from the structural set AUC (0.816).

Comparative EffectivenessCohortProspective Observational Studyn=93 glaucoma patients, 113 control sub…Ch5Ch12

Neural network models indicate that OCTA optic nerve head vascular biomarkers are equally useful for machine learning diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) when compared to OCT structural biomarker features alone.

DiagnosisCohortProspective Observational Studyn=93 glaucoma patients, 113 control sub…Ch5Ch12

Neural network models, specifically multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs), were trained on a prospectively collected observational dataset of 93 glaucoma patients and 113 control subjects to identify relevant ocular biomarkers for the diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).

MethodologyCohortProspective Observational Studyn=93 glaucoma patients, 113 control sub…Ch12

The base neural network model for diagnosing primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) used intraocular pressure, blood pressure, heart rate, and visual field parameters.

DiagnosisCohortProspective Observational Studyn=93 glaucoma patients, 113 control sub…Ch3Ch6Ch12

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.