AFG3L2 and ACO2-Linked Dominant Optic Atrophy: Genotype-Phenotype Characterization Compared to OPA1 Patients.
Amore Giulia, Romagnoli Martina, Carbonelli Michele, Cascavilla Maria Lucia, De Negri Anna Maria, Carta Arturo, Parisi Vincenzo, Di Renzo Antonio, Schiavi Costantino, Lenzetti Chiara
AI Summary
This study compared AFG3L2, ACO2, and OPA1-related Dominant Optic Atrophy. ACO2-DOA showed better retinal ganglion cell preservation than AFG3L2/OPA1-DOA, implying different disease mechanisms despite similar clinical presentation.
Abstract
Purpose
Heterozygous mutations in the AFG3L2 gene (encoding a mitochondrial protease indirectly reflecting on OPA1 cleavage) and ACO2 gene (encoding the mitochondrial enzyme aconitase) are associated with isolated forms of Dominant Optic Atrophy (DOA). We aimed at describing their neuro-ophthalmological phenotype as compared with classic OPA1-related DOA.
Design
Cross-sectional study.
Methods
The following neuro-ophthalmological parameters were collected: logMAR visual acuity (VA), color vision, mean deviation and foveal threshold at visual fields, average and sectorial retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), and ganglion cell layer (GCL) thickness on optical coherence tomography. ACO2 and AFG3L2 patients were compared with an age- and sex-matched group of OPA1 patients with a 1:2 ratio. All eyes were analyzed using a clustered Wilcoxon rank sum test with the Rosner-Glynn-Lee method.
Results
A total of 44 eyes from 23 ACO2 patients and 26 eyes from 13 AFG3L2 patients were compared with 143 eyes from 72 OPA1 patients. All cases presented with bilateral temporal-predominant optic atrophy with various degree of visual impairment. Comparison between AFG3L2 and OPA1 failed to reveal any significant difference. ACO2 patients compared to both AFG3L2 and OPA1 presented overall higher values of nasal RNFL thickness (P = .029, P = .023), average thickness (P = .012, P = .0007), and sectorial GCL thickness. These results were confirmed also comparing separately affected and subclinical patients.
Conclusions
Clinically, DOA remains a fairly homogeneous entity despite the growing genetic heterogeneity. ACO2 seems to be associated with an overall better preservation of retinal ganglion cells, probably depending on the different pathogenic mechanism involving mtDNA maintenance, as opposed to AFG3L2, which is involved in OPA1 processing and is virtually indistinguishable from classic OPA1-DOA.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts5
Comparison between AFG3L2 patients (13 patients, 26 eyes) and OPA1 patients (72 patients, 143 eyes) failed to reveal any significant difference in neuro-ophthalmological parameters.
ACO2 patients (23 patients, 44 eyes) compared to both AFG3L2 patients (13 patients, 26 eyes) and OPA1 patients (72 patients, 143 eyes) presented overall higher values of nasal retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness (P = .029, P = .023), average RNFL thickness (P = .012, P = .0007), and sectorial ganglion cell layer (GCL) thickness.
Dominant Optic Atrophy (DOA) associated with ACO2 mutations seems to be associated with an overall better preservation of retinal ganglion cells compared to AFG3L2 and OPA1-related DOA.
Heterozygous mutations in the AFG3L2 gene and ACO2 gene are associated with isolated forms of Dominant Optic Atrophy (DOA).
All 23 ACO2 patients, 13 AFG3L2 patients, and 72 OPA1 patients presented with bilateral temporal-predominant optic atrophy with various degrees of visual impairment.
Related Articles5
Predictors of Final Visual Outcome in Patients With Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy Treated With Lenadogene Nolparvovec Gene Therapy.
Clinical TrialMitochondrial retinopathies and optic neuropathies: The impact of retinal imaging on modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management.
ReviewOphthalmic Findings in the KIF1A-Associated Neurologic Disorder (KAND).
Cross-Sectional StudyOptic Nerve Head Morphological Variation in Craniosynostosis: A Cohort Study.
Cohort StudyCharacterization of Ocular Morphology in Col4a3-/- Mice as a Murine Model for Alport Syndrome.
Basic ScienceIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.