Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-Up Study (NYC-SIGHT): optometric exam improves access and utilization of eye care services.
Diamond Daniel F, Hirji Sitara, Xing Samantha X, Gorroochurn Prakash, Horowitz Jason D, Wang Qing, Park Lisa, Harizman Noga, Maruri Stefania C, Henriquez Desiree R
AI Summary
Community-based optometric exams effectively detected vision-affecting conditions in underserved populations. This improves eye care access, especially for those with prior diagnoses or Spanish speakers, highlighting optometrists' crucial role.
Abstract
Purpose
To describe the benefits of optometric evaluation for detection of vision-affecting conditions in the context of community-based eye health screenings and identify factors associated with having a recent dilated eye exam.
Methods
Enrolled participants were age 40 and older, living independently in affordable housing developments in New York City. Eye health screening failure and criteria for seeing the on-site study optometrist were defined as visual acuity 20/40 or worse in either eye, intraocular pressure 23-29 mmHg, or an unreadable fundus image. The optometrist conducted a manifest refraction using loose lenses and used a portable slit lamp and ophthalmoscope to perform a non-dilated anterior and posterior segment ocular health evaluation. Demographics, social determinants of health, eye health screening results, and rates of suspected ophthalmic conditions were recorded. To determine factors associated with having a recent dilated eye exam, which was the main outcome for this statistical analysis, a stepwise multivariate logistic regression was performed.
Results
A total of 708 participants were screened, 308 attended the optometric exam; mean age 70.7 ± 11.7 [standard deviation (SD)] years. Among this subgroup, 70.1% identified as female, 54.9% self-identified as African American, 39% as Hispanic/Latino, and 26.6% Dominican ethnicity; 78.2% (241/308) had not undergone a dilated eye exam within the last year, 71.4% reported they did not have an eye care provider. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that participants who self-reported having cataracts (odds ratio (OR) 2.15; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-4.47; p = 0.041), self-reported having glaucoma/glaucoma suspect (OR 5.60; 95% CI 2.02-15.43; p = 0.001), or spoke Spanish as their primary language (OR 3.25; 95% CI 1.48-7.11; p = 0.003) had higher odds of having a recent dilated eye exam.
Conclusions
This community-based screening initiative demonstrated the effectiveness of optometric exams in detecting vision-affecting conditions and identified factors associated with having a recent dilated eye exam. Optometrists play a vital role in increasing access to eye care for high-risk, underserved populations.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04271709).
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts5
Among 308 participants aged 40 and older from affordable housing developments in New York City who attended an optometric exam, 78.2% (241/308) had not undergone a dilated eye exam within the last year.
Among 308 participants aged 40 and older from affordable housing developments in New York City who attended an optometric exam, 71.4% reported they did not have an eye care provider.
In a community-based eye health screening of 708 participants, a stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that participants who self-reported having cataracts had higher odds of having a recent dilated eye exam (odds ratio (OR) 2.15; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-4.47; p=0.041).
In a community-based eye health screening of 708 participants, a stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that participants who self-reported having glaucoma/glaucoma suspect had higher odds of having a recent dilated eye exam (odds ratio (OR) 5.60; 95% CI 2.02-15.43; p=0.001).
In a community-based eye health screening of 708 participants, a stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that participants who spoke Spanish as their primary language had higher odds of having a recent dilated eye exam (odds ratio (OR) 3.25; 95% CI 1.48-7.11; p=0.003).
Related Articles5
A Screening Strategy to Mitigate Vision Impairment by Engaging Adults Who Underuse Eye Care Services.
Cross-Sectional StudyBarriers and Potential Solutions to Glaucoma Screening in the Developing World: A Review.
ReviewAssociation of Contrast Sensitivity With Eye Disease and Vision-Related Quality of Life.
Cross-Sectional StudySocial Determinants of Health and Glaucoma Screening and Detection in the SIGHT Studies.
Observational StudySocial Deprivation and the Risk of Screening Positive for Glaucoma in the MI-SIGHT Telemedicine-Based Glaucoma Detection Program.
Cross-Sectional StudyIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.