Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

Invest Ophthalmol Vis SciJanuary 20244 citations

Change of Intraocular Pressure Over 5 Years and its Relationship to Cardiovascular Parameters: Results From the Gutenberg Health Study.

Hartmann Alica, Scholz Ida, Hoffmann Esther M, Strzalkowska Alicja, Lackner Karl J, Münzel Thomas, Wicke Felix S, Schmidtmann Irene, Tüscher Oliver, Schattenberg Jörn M


AI Summary

This study found intraocular pressure (IOP) increased over 5 years, linked to changes in BMI and systolic blood pressure. Monitoring cardiovascular risk factors is important for IOP management.

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the longitudinal change in intraocular pressure (IOP) over 5 years and its relationship with cardiovascular parameters in a population-based sample in Germany.

Methods

The Gutenberg Health Study is a prospective, observational, single-center cohort study. The sample was equally stratified for sex, residence, and age decade. IOP was measured with noncontact tonometry at baseline and at 5-year follow-up. Cardiovascular parameters, including body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure, and diabetes status, were assessed. Participants without IOP measurement at one time point, who were taking IOP-lowering medications, or who had ophthalmic surgery during the 5-year follow-up interval were excluded, as well as those with glaucoma diagnosis. Univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were conducted.

Results

This analysis included 9633 participants (48.9% female). The mean IOP increased from 14.04 ± 2.78 mmHg at baseline to 14.77 ± 2.92 mmHg at 5-year follow-up (P < 0.001). In multivariable linear regression analyses, an increase in BMI was associated with an increase in IOP over time (P < 0.001), whereas a higher baseline BMI was associated with a lower IOP change (P < 0.001). Higher age and male sex were associated with higher IOP change (P < 0.001). A change in systolic blood pressure was associated with IOP change, whereas baseline systolic blood pressure and diabetes status were not associated.

Conclusions

This population-based study found a relationship between IOP change over 5 years and BMI and systolic blood pressure change, respectively. These findings suggest the importance of monitoring cardiovascular risk factors in IOP management.


MeSH Terms

FemaleHumansMaleCohort StudiesDiabetes MellitusGlaucomaIntraocular PressureProspective Studies

Key Concepts5

In a population-based sample in Germany, the mean intraocular pressure (IOP) increased from 14.04 ± 2.78 mmHg at baseline to 14.77 ± 2.92 mmHg at 5-year follow-up (P < 0.001) in 9633 participants.

PrognosisCohortProspective, observational, single-center cohort studyn=9633 participantsCh3Ch10

In a population-based sample of 9633 participants in Germany, multivariable linear regression analyses showed that an increase in BMI was associated with an increase in IOP over 5 years (P < 0.001).

PrognosisCohortProspective, observational, single-center cohort studyn=9633 participantsCh3Ch10

In a population-based sample of 9633 participants in Germany, multivariable linear regression analyses showed that a higher baseline BMI was associated with a lower intraocular pressure (IOP) change over 5 years (P < 0.001).

PrognosisCohortProspective, observational, single-center cohort studyn=9633 participantsCh3Ch10

In a population-based sample of 9633 participants in Germany, multivariable linear regression analyses showed that higher age and male sex were associated with higher intraocular pressure (IOP) change over 5 years (P < 0.001).

PrognosisCohortProspective, observational, single-center cohort studyn=9633 participantsCh3Ch10

In a population-based sample of 9633 participants in Germany, multivariable linear regression analyses showed that a change in systolic blood pressure was associated with intraocular pressure (IOP) change over 5 years, whereas baseline systolic blood pressure and diabetes status were not associated.

PrognosisCohortProspective, observational, single-center cohort studyn=9633 participantsCh3Ch10

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.