Change of Intraocular Pressure Over 5 Years and its Relationship to Cardiovascular Parameters: Results From the Gutenberg Health Study.
Hartmann Alica, Scholz Ida, Hoffmann Esther M, Strzalkowska Alicja, Lackner Karl J, Münzel Thomas, Wicke Felix S, Schmidtmann Irene, Tüscher Oliver, Schattenberg Jörn M
AI Summary
This study found intraocular pressure (IOP) increased over 5 years, linked to changes in BMI and systolic blood pressure. Monitoring cardiovascular risk factors is important for IOP management.
Abstract
Purpose
To investigate the longitudinal change in intraocular pressure (IOP) over 5 years and its relationship with cardiovascular parameters in a population-based sample in Germany.
Methods
The Gutenberg Health Study is a prospective, observational, single-center cohort study. The sample was equally stratified for sex, residence, and age decade. IOP was measured with noncontact tonometry at baseline and at 5-year follow-up. Cardiovascular parameters, including body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure, and diabetes status, were assessed. Participants without IOP measurement at one time point, who were taking IOP-lowering medications, or who had ophthalmic surgery during the 5-year follow-up interval were excluded, as well as those with glaucoma diagnosis. Univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were conducted.
Results
This analysis included 9633 participants (48.9% female). The mean IOP increased from 14.04 ± 2.78 mmHg at baseline to 14.77 ± 2.92 mmHg at 5-year follow-up (P < 0.001). In multivariable linear regression analyses, an increase in BMI was associated with an increase in IOP over time (P < 0.001), whereas a higher baseline BMI was associated with a lower IOP change (P < 0.001). Higher age and male sex were associated with higher IOP change (P < 0.001). A change in systolic blood pressure was associated with IOP change, whereas baseline systolic blood pressure and diabetes status were not associated.
Conclusions
This population-based study found a relationship between IOP change over 5 years and BMI and systolic blood pressure change, respectively. These findings suggest the importance of monitoring cardiovascular risk factors in IOP management.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts5
In a population-based sample in Germany, the mean intraocular pressure (IOP) increased from 14.04 ± 2.78 mmHg at baseline to 14.77 ± 2.92 mmHg at 5-year follow-up (P < 0.001) in 9633 participants.
In a population-based sample of 9633 participants in Germany, multivariable linear regression analyses showed that an increase in BMI was associated with an increase in IOP over 5 years (P < 0.001).
In a population-based sample of 9633 participants in Germany, multivariable linear regression analyses showed that a higher baseline BMI was associated with a lower intraocular pressure (IOP) change over 5 years (P < 0.001).
In a population-based sample of 9633 participants in Germany, multivariable linear regression analyses showed that higher age and male sex were associated with higher intraocular pressure (IOP) change over 5 years (P < 0.001).
In a population-based sample of 9633 participants in Germany, multivariable linear regression analyses showed that a change in systolic blood pressure was associated with intraocular pressure (IOP) change over 5 years, whereas baseline systolic blood pressure and diabetes status were not associated.
Related Articles5
Comparative insights into the role of sex hormones in glaucoma among women and men.
ReviewElevated Intraocular Pressure Immediately after Cataract Surgery and Future Risk of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma in the IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight).
Cohort StudySecondary ocular hypertension as an adverse effect of treatment with intravitreal dexamethasone implant: A retrospective Swedish cohort study.
Cohort StudyContinuous 24-hour intraocular pressure monitoring in normal Chinese adults using a novel contact lens sensor system.
Observational StudyPosner-Schlossman Syndrome European Study Group: study protocol and baseline patients characteristics of a multicentre study.
Cohort StudyIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.