Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

J GlaucomaMay 20250 citations

Clinical Outcomes of Intraluminal Stent Removal After PAUL Glaucoma Implant Surgery.

Weber Constance, Samarghitan Diana, Bourauel Leonie, Walz Wolfgang, Hundertmark Sarah, Petrak Michael, Holz Frank G, Mercieca Karl


AI Summary

Removing the PAUL implant's intraluminal stent significantly lowers IOP but carries hypotony/hemorrhage risks, with most patients eventually needing additional drops. This highlights a trade-off between efficacy and complication risk.

Abstract

Précis: Intraluminal stent-removal post-PGI surgery significantly reduces IOP with high success rates but carries the risk of hypotony and complications, for example, suprachoroidal hemorrhage. Long-term management often requires the eventual addition of IOP-lowering therapy despite initial efficacy.

Background

To report outcomes after intraluminal stent removal following PAUL Glaucoma Implant (PGI) surgery from a single-center cohort.

Materials and methods

Retrospective review of patients undergoing intraluminal prolene removal following PGI surgery at the University Eye Hospital, Bonn, Germany, from April 2021 to November 2023.

Results

Seventy eyes of 68 patients were included. Qualified and complete success rates (95% CI) were 92.9% and 55.7% after 1 year and 88.6% (81.4% to 95.7%) and 50% (37.1% to 62.9%) at the last follow-up time point for IOP ≤18 mm Hg and 81.4% and 54.3% and 70% and 42.9% IOP ≤15 mm Hg, respectively. Mean IOP decreased from 23.93 to 12.07 mm Hg after 12 months, 11.32 mm Hg after 24 months, and 10.41 mm Hg after 36 months. The mean number of IOP-lowering eye drops was zero before and immediately after removal and increased to 1.57 (0 to 2) at 12 months, 1.15 (0 to 4) at 24 months, and 1.12 (0 to 4) at 36 months. Postoperative complications occurred in 5 eyes (7.1%). Two eyes had suprachoroidal hemorrhage, with one needing vitrectomy and one external tube ligation; one required PGI explantation for persistent hypotony.

Conclusions

Removal of the prolene stent following PGI surgery effectively lowers IOP in the short term, with a moderate increase in IOP and need for pressure-lowering therapy over time. However, it can also lead to adverse outcomes, such as hypotony and suprachoroidal hemorrhage, especially in patients with systemic risk factors or those undergoing early removal.


MeSH Terms

HumansGlaucoma Drainage ImplantsRetrospective StudiesMaleFemaleDevice RemovalIntraocular PressureStentsAgedMiddle AgedGlaucomaVisual AcuityFollow-Up StudiesAged, 80 and overPostoperative ComplicationsAdultTreatment Outcome

Key Concepts5

Intraluminal stent removal after PAUL Glaucoma Implant (PGI) surgery significantly reduces intraocular pressure (IOP) with high success rates but carries risks of hypotony and complications, such as suprachoroidal hemorrhage.

TreatmentCohortRetrospective Cohort Studyn=70 eyes of 68 patientsCh42

The qualified and complete success rates for intraluminal stent removal after PAUL Glaucoma Implant (PGI) surgery were 92.9% and 55.7% after 1 year, and 88.6% (95% CI: 81.4% to 95.7%) and 50% (95% CI: 37.1% to 62.9%) at the last follow-up for IOP ≤18 mm Hg.

TreatmentCohortRetrospective Cohort Studyn=70 eyes of 68 patientsCh42

Mean intraocular pressure (IOP) decreased from 23.93 mm Hg before intraluminal stent removal after PAUL Glaucoma Implant (PGI) surgery to 12.07 mm Hg after 12 months, 11.32 mm Hg after 24 months, and 10.41 mm Hg after 36 months.

TreatmentCohortRetrospective Cohort Studyn=70 eyes of 68 patientsCh42

Postoperative complications occurred in 5 eyes (7.1%) after intraluminal stent removal following PAUL Glaucoma Implant (PGI) surgery, including two eyes with suprachoroidal hemorrhage (one requiring vitrectomy and one external tube ligation) and one eye requiring PGI explantation for persistent hypotony.

TreatmentCohortRetrospective Cohort Studyn=70 eyes of 68 patientsCh42

The mean number of IOP-lowering eye drops used after intraluminal stent removal following PAUL Glaucoma Implant (PGI) surgery was zero before and immediately after removal, increasing to 1.57 (range: 0 to 2) at 12 months, 1.15 (range: 0 to 4) at 24 months, and 1.12 (range: 0 to 4) at 36 months.

TreatmentCohortRetrospective Cohort Studyn=70 eyes of 68 patientsCh28Ch42

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.