Aqueous Humor Dynamics Changes and Predictors of IOP Response to Latanoprost in Healthy Subjects.
Kazemi Arash, Reitinger Jeremy C, Toris Carol B, Gulati Vikas, Fan Shan, Reed David M, Moroi Sayoko E, Sit Arthur J
AI Summary
This study found that healthy individuals with higher baseline IOP, lower uveoscleral outflow, and higher BMI respond better to latanoprost, primarily due to increased uveoscleral outflow.
Abstract
Précis: In our study of the factors predictive of latanoprost response, we found that normotensive subjects with higher intraocular pressure, lower uveoscleral outflow, and higher body mass index had a greater response to 1-week treatment.
Purpose
To evaluate relationships between variable intraocular pressure (IOP) responses to latanoprost and participant characteristics, baseline values and changes in aqueous humor dynamics (AHD) parameters.
Methods
We assessed 226 eyes from 113 healthy participants. AHD parameters measured at baseline and after 1-week treatment with latanoprost included: IOP by pneumatonometry, episcleral venous pressure (EVP) by venomanometry, aqueous humor flow rate by fluorophotometry, outflow facility by 2-minute pneumatonography, and uveoscleral outflow calculated using the modified Goldmann equation. IOP responses were categorized into 4 groups: nonresponders (<10% reduction), all-responders (≥10% reduction), medium-responders (10%-20% reduction), and high-responders (≥20% reduction). Generalized estimating equation models were used to analyze treatment effects and compare groups.
Results
Baseline IOP was higher in high-responders than medium-responders and nonresponders ( P =0.007 and P <0.001, respectively). Body mass index (BMI) was significantly higher in high-responders and all-responders compared with nonresponders ( P =0.02 and P =0.03, respectively). Responders had lower baseline uveoscleral outflow ( P =0.03). There were no significant differences in other baseline characteristics including EVP, outflow facility, and aqueous flow rate between the 4 groups. IOP decreased while outflow facility and uveoscleral outflow increased after latanoprost treatment in all responder groups but did not change in nonresponders. EVP and aqueous flow rate did not change significantly in any group. The change in uveoscleral outflow was greater in high-responders than in nonresponders ( P =0.004).
Conclusions
In healthy subjects, higher baseline IOP, lower uveoscleral outflow and higher BMI are predictors of a greater IOP reduction by latanoprost. A greater increase in uveoscleral outflow is responsible for this larger response.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts6
In healthy subjects, higher baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) is a predictor of a greater IOP reduction by latanoprost.
In healthy subjects, lower uveoscleral outflow is a predictor of a greater IOP reduction by latanoprost.
In healthy subjects, higher body mass index (BMI) is a predictor of a greater IOP reduction by latanoprost.
A greater increase in uveoscleral outflow is responsible for the larger intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction response to latanoprost in healthy subjects.
Baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) was higher in high-responders to latanoprost than medium-responders (P =0.007) and nonresponders (P <0.001) in a study of 226 eyes from 113 healthy participants.
Body mass index (BMI) was significantly higher in high-responders (P =0.02) and all-responders (P =0.03) to latanoprost compared with nonresponders in a study of 226 eyes from 113 healthy participants.
Related Articles5
Prostaglandin F2 alpha-1-isopropylester lowers intraocular pressure without decreasing aqueous humor flow.
Randomized Controlled TrialUse of topical diclofenac in association with external ocular compression.
Clinical TrialEffects of apraclonidine on aqueous humor dynamics in human eyes.
Randomized Controlled TrialEffects of PhXA41, a new prostaglandin F2 alpha analog, on aqueous humor dynamics in human eyes.
Randomized Controlled TrialProstaglandin F2 alpha-isopropylester eye drops: effects in normal human eyes.
Clinical TrialIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.