Patient Navigators Improve In-Office Eye Exam Adherence After Community Eye Screenings in a Randomized Clinical Trial: NYC-SIGHT Study.
Hark Lisa A, Gorroochurn Prakash, Pizzi Laura T, Jutkowitz Eric, Goulak Annette M, Maruri Stefania C, Harizman Noga, Horowitz Jason D, Park Lisa, Wang Qing
AI Summary
Patient navigators significantly improved adherence to follow-up eye exams after community screenings in underserved populations, offering a cost-effective strategy to enhance eye care access.
Abstract
Purpose
To assess the effectiveness and cost of patient navigators in improving adherence to an initial in-office eye exam following community-based eye health screenings and referral to ophthalmology among underserved populations.
Design
5-year prospective, cluster-randomized clinical trial.
Participants
Eligible individuals aged 40 years and older were recruited from affordable housing developments and senior centers in Upper Manhattan.
Methods
Demographics, social determinants of health, clinical characteristics, and access to eye care were collected. Eye health screenings included visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and fundus photography. Those diagnosed with glaucoma, suspected glaucoma, retinal abnormalities, cataracts, or other ocular conditions were referred for in-office eye exams, with initial appointments scheduled by study staff. Navigator Intervention participants received appointment scheduling support for 10 months, Usual Care participants did not receive navigator assistance. T tests, chi-square tests and multivariate stepwise logistic regression analyzed factors associated with adherence. Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted alongside the study.
Main outcome measures
Adherence to the initial in-office eye exam for those referred to ophthalmology.
Results
Of 468 referred participants, 47% (n = 220/468) attended the initial in-office eye exam. Adherence rates: Navigator Intervention (51.8%) versus Usual Care (38.1%). Of those who attended the in-office eye exam, mean age: 70.2 ± 11.3 years; 65.5% female; 46.8% African American, 47.3% Hispanic. Participants in the Navigator Intervention group had higher odds of adhering to the initial in-office eye exam compared to those receiving Usual Care (OR = 1.529; 95% CI (1.023, 2.285)). Participants who spoke English as their primary language also had higher odds of adhering to the initial eye exam (OR = 1.815; 95% CI (1.211, 2721)). Cost per participant in the Navigator Intervention group who attended the in-office eye exam: $24.25 vs. $33.03 per Usual Care participant.
Conclusions
Patient navigators improved adherence to in-office eye exams following community-based eye health screenings and referral to ophthalmology among an underserved population. The Navigator Intervention resulted in cost savings with an incremental cost-effectiveness difference of $8.78 less per participant randomized to the Navigator Intervention group.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts4
Patient navigators improved adherence to initial in-office eye exams following community-based eye health screenings and referral to ophthalmology among an underserved population, with adherence rates of 51.8% in the Navigator Intervention group versus 38.1% in the Usual Care group.
Participants in the Navigator Intervention group had higher odds of adhering to the initial in-office eye exam compared to those receiving Usual Care (OR = 1.529; 95% CI (1.023, 2.285)) in a randomized clinical trial among an underserved population.
The Navigator Intervention resulted in cost savings with an incremental cost-effectiveness difference of $8.78 less per participant randomized to the Navigator Intervention group, compared to Usual Care, for improving adherence to in-office eye exams.
Participants who spoke English as their primary language had higher odds of adhering to the initial eye exam (OR = 1.815; 95% CI (1.211, 2.721)) in a randomized clinical trial assessing adherence after community eye screenings.
Related Articles5
Outcomes of Trabeculectomy With Mitomycin C in Patients of Hispanic vs European Descent.
Cohort StudyFederally Qualified Health Centers as a Model to Improve Vision Health: A Systematic Review.
Systematic ReviewQuality of Care in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glaucoma.
Cohort StudySemi-automated screening reveals patients with glaucoma-induced blindness missing out on social support: a cross-sectional study of certificate of visual impairment allocation.
Cross-Sectional StudyAge-period-cohort analysis of the global burden of visual impairment according to major causes: an analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.
Cohort StudyIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.