Noninvasive evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid pressure in ocular hypertension: a preliminary study.
Xiaobin Xie, Weiwei Chen, Zhen Li, Ravi Thomas, Yong Li, Junfang Xian, Diya Yang, Huaizhou Wang, Shoukang Zhang, Zefeng Kang, Ningli Wang
Summary
The wider OSASW and higher estimated CSFP in OH subjects suggest a higher orbital CSFP.
Abstract
PURPOSE
To compare the orbital cerebral spinal fluid pressure (CSFP) and trans-lamina cribrosa pressure difference (TLCPD) determined noninvasively in ocular hypertensive (OH) subjects and controls.
METHODS
Cross-sectional observational study. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure orbital subarachnoid space width (OSASW). The CSFP (mm Hg) was estimated from a published formula as 17.54 × MRI derived OSASW at 15 mm behind the globe + 0.47 × body mass index + 0.13 × mean arterial blood pressure -21.52. Estimated TLCPD was calculated as IOP- CSFP.
RESULTS
The orbital subarachnoid space width was significantly wider (p = 0.01) in the OH group than in the control group at all three measurement locations. The MRI derived CSFP value in OH (14.9 ± 2.9 mm Hg) was significantly higher than in the normal group (12.0 ± 2.8 mm Hg; p < 0.01). The estimated TLCPD value in OH (9.0 ± 4.2 mm Hg) was significantly higher than in controls (3.6 ± 3.0 mm Hg; p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION
The wider OSASW and higher estimated CSFP in OH subjects suggest a higher orbital CSFP. Despite a higher orbital CSFP that could be protective, the higher TLCPD in OH may play a significant role in the risk of developing glaucoma.
Keywords
More by Xiaobin Xie
View full profile →Top Research in IOP & Medical Therapy
Browse all →The Complications of Myopia: A Review and Meta-Analysis.
Inflammation in Glaucoma: From the back to the front of the eye, and beyond.
Treatment Outcomes in the Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study after 1 Year of Follow-up.
Discussion
Comments and discussion will appear here in a future update.