Complications of cosmetic iris implants: French series of 87 eyes.
Chehab Hussam El, Damien Gatinel, Christophe Baudouin, Marc Muraine, Louis Hoffart, Pascal Rozot, Chadi Mehanna, Clémence Bonnet, Jean-Philippe Nordmann, Pierre-Yves Santiago, Carole Burillon, Stéphanie Baillif, Pierre Jean Pisella, Michel Weber, Antoine Robinet-Perrin, Danielle Deidier, Aurélien Hay, Max Villain, Georges Baïkoff, Anne Sophie Gauthier, Thibaud Mathis, Corinne Dot
Summary
Several ocular complications with a decreased mean visual acuity were described in a young healthy population. In addition, patient information on the safety of this procedure appeared insufficient.
Abstract
PURPOSE
Iris intraocular implants were developed to manage congenital or traumatic iris defects. However, they are also used to change the color of patient eyes. The aim of this retrospective series was to report complications in patients managed in France after cosmetic implantation.
SETTING
Ophthalmological institutions and private ophthalmologists in France.
DESIGN
Multicenter retrospective observational study.
METHODS
Questionnaires were sent to all ophthalmology departments in university hospitals and to private ophthalmologists. This questionnaire listed demographic and clinical data for each implanted eye with a focus on safety, the description of ocular complications (corneal edema, endothelial cell loss, increased intraocular pressure, and intraocular inflammation), and the therapeutic management implemented.
RESULTS
Forty-four questionnaires (87 eyes) were collected, and ultimately, 33 questionnaires (65 eyes) were considered complete and analyzed. Two types of implants were identified. Of the 65 eyes analyzed, only 5 eyes (7.7%) did not experience any complication and 60 eyes (92.3%) had at least 1 complication. The most commonly reported complication was corneal decompensation (78.5%). The diagnosis of glaucoma was made in over half (52.3%) of the cases. Explantation was needed in 81.5% of cases. The mean final visual acuity was 0.45 ± 0.08 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (0 to 2 logMAR).
CONCLUSIONS
Several ocular complications with a decreased mean visual acuity were described in a young healthy population. In addition, patient information on the safety of this procedure appeared insufficient.
More by Chehab Hussam El
View full profile →A prospective multicentre study of intravitreal injections and ocular surface in 219 patients: IVIS study.
Retinal Pigment Epithelium Tear After Nonpenetrating Deep Sclerectomy.
Progression of visual field in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma - ProgF study 1.
Top Research in IOP & Medical Therapy
Browse all →The Complications of Myopia: A Review and Meta-Analysis.
Inflammation in Glaucoma: From the back to the front of the eye, and beyond.
Treatment Outcomes in the Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study after 1 Year of Follow-up.
Discussion
Comments and discussion will appear here in a future update.