Lessons to be learned from the Collaborative Glaucoma Study.
AI Summary
This study found that while several factors (e.g., tonography, age, pressure, cup/disc, water drinking test) were associated with glaucoma progression, their predictive ability for future visual field loss was limited.
Abstract
The Collaborative Glaucoma Study was designed to test the hypothesis that tests of ocular pressure and its fluid dynamics before and after water drinking can predict those eyes at risk of developing field defects in the future and to describe quantitatively the predictive value of these measures. Ninety-eight of 5886 eyes (1.7%) with elevated pressures developed field damage over 1-13 years of followup. Comparing the eyes that incurred damage with those that did not, five factors were identified as having a standardized coefficient which was statistically significant; these were C-value of tonography, age, applanation pressure, cup/disc ratio and pressure change after water drinking. However, the predictive ability of all five factors--alone or considered cumulatively--was limited. A major contribution of the Collaborative Study may be in highlighting the need to continue the search for factors--perhaps hitherto unsuspected--that influence the development of glaucomatous visual field defects.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Related Articles5
Diurnal IOP fluctuation: not an independent risk factor for glaucomatous visual field loss in high-risk ocular hypertension.
Cohort StudySeasonal changes in visual field sensitivity and intraocular pressure in the ocular hypertension treatment study.
Case SeriesEffect of intraocular pressure on the Bayesian estimation of rates of visual field progression in glaucoma.
Observational StudyAsymmetries and visual field summaries as predictors of glaucoma in the ocular hypertension treatment study.
Cohort StudyEffect of Community Screening on the Demographic Makeup and Clinical Severity of Glaucoma Patients Receiving Care in Urban China.
Cohort StudyIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.