Fornix-Based Trabeculectomy Conjunctival Closure: Winged Sutures versus Modified Wise Closure.

PURPOSE

To compare the midterm safety and efficacy profile of winged sutures versus modified Wise closure for fornix-based trabeculectomy.

DESIGN

Retrospective comparative study.

PARTICIPANTS

Consecutive cases that underwent fornix-based trabeculectomy by a single surgeon between January 5, 2015, and May 8, 2017.

METHODS

Potential cases were identified using the Current Procedural Terminology code, and their charts were reviewed thoroughly. Only 1 eye per patient was included. Demographic and clinical data were collected.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcomes were bleb leak and subsequent surgical revision rates. Secondary outcomes included intraocular pressure (IOP), number of glaucoma medications (NGM), visual acuity (VA), and other complications.

RESULTS

A total of 313 patients were identified, 157 with winged sutures and 156 with modified Wise closure. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Twenty-six cases (16.6%) of winged sutures and 10 cases (6.4%) of modified Wise group developed bleb leak (P = 0.007), but only a total of 10 eyes needed bleb revision (P = 0.336). Other complications were similar in rates between the groups (P > 0.05). At 6 months, the modified Wise group had significantly greater IOP reduction (-3.10±1.29 [standard error], P = 0.016). Number of glaucoma medications reduction and VA evolution were similar between the 2 groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Fornix-based trabeculectomy with either closure technique was effective in lowering IOP and NGM with comparable safety profile at 6 months. Furthermore, modified Wise closure provided larger IOP reduction and lower bleb leak rate, suggesting a potential superiority to winged sutures. Our study was limited by mitomycin C (MMC) delivery method change near the time of conjunctival closure change, although MMC delivery methods did not show significance in any outcome model.