Sustained reduction of intraocular pressure in humans with the calcium channel blocker verapamil.
Abelson M B, Gilbert C M, Smith L M
AI Summary
Topical verapamil significantly lowered intraocular pressure in ocular hypertensive patients for up to ten hours, suggesting its potential as a new glaucoma treatment.
Abstract
We investigated the effect of the calcium channel blocker verapamil on intraocular pressure in human volunteers. In the initial trial, 15 subjects with untreated ocular hypertension were tested. After a baseline measurement was obtained with applanation tonometry, a 40-microliter drop of verapamil, 1.25 mg/ml, was instilled in one eye. After 30 minutes, a second reading was taken. In a subsequent trial of 12 untreated ocular hypertensive subjects, the duration of action was determined using the same dose and method of delivery. Results showed that verapamil elicited a mean +/- S.E.M. change in intraocular pressure of -3.8 +/- 0.900 mm Hg in the treated eye, and -1.6 +/- 0.400 mm Hg in the untreated eye. This reduction was statistically different in both eyes (treated eye, P = .0007; untreated eye, P = .005). This decrease in intraocular pressure remained statistically significant when compared to predrug baseline values for up to ten hours.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Related Articles5
Safety and Efficacy of Omidenepag Isopropyl for Elevated Intraocular Pressure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Systematic ReviewShort-term intraocular pressure changes after intravitreal aflibercept 2 mg, aflibercept 8 mg and faricimab: a prospective, comparative study.
Observational StudyPhase 3, Randomized, Comparison Study of Intracameral Bimatoprost Implant 10 µg and Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty.
Randomized Controlled TrialOcular effects of Rho kinase (ROCK) inhibition: a systematic review.
Systematic ReviewA phase III study comparing preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion with preserved latanoprost in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Randomized Controlled TrialIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.