Comparison of Clinical Outcomes with Open Versus Closed Conjunctiva Implantation of the XEN45 Gel Stent.
Anna Do, Elyse McGlumphy, Aakriti Shukla, Sonal Dangda, Joel S Schuman, Michael V Boland, Jithin Yohannan, Joseph F Panarelli, E Randy Craven
Summary
Implantation of the XEN45 with opening of the conjunctiva is a safe and efficacious procedure to lower IOP with comparable success rate and lower needling rate compared with the closed conjunctiva technique.
Abstract
PURPOSE
To describe the efficacy and safety of open versus closed conjunctival implantation of the XEN45 Gel Stent (Allergan Inc).
DESIGN
Retrospective, multicenter study.
PARTICIPANTS
A total of 137 patients with glaucoma who underwent XEN45 implantation via open or closed conjunctival methods. The XEN45 was implanted as a stand-alone procedure or at the time of cataract surgery by 5 surgeons.
METHODS
Patient demographics, diagnoses, preoperative and postoperative clinical data, outcome measures including intraocular pressure (IOP), use of glaucoma medications, visual acuity, and complications were collected. Statistical analyses were performed with P 21 mmHg at 2 consecutive visits at postoperative month 1 and beyond, the need for subsequent operative intervention or additional glaucoma surgery, or a catastrophic event such as loss of light perception. Eyes that had not failed by these criteria and were not on glaucoma medications were considered complete successes. Eyes that had not failed but required glaucoma medications were defined as qualified successes.
RESULTS
Complete success was achieved in 31% and 56% of the closed and open groups, respectively (P = 0.01). Qualified success was achieved in 53% and 71% of the closed and open groups, respectively (P = 0.06). At postoperative month 12, the open conjunctiva group was using fewer glaucoma medications than the closed group (0.9 vs. 1.8, respectively; P = 0.02). At postoperative month 12, the open group had a significantly greater percentage of IOP reduction compared with the closed group (43.1% vs. 24.8%, respectively; P = 0.02). Postoperative needling rates were higher in the closed group compared with the open group (36.1% vs. 11.8%, P = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Implantation of the XEN45 with opening of the conjunctiva is a safe and efficacious procedure to lower IOP with comparable success rate and lower needling rate compared with the closed conjunctiva technique. Prospective evaluation of the various methods for XEN45 implantation will allow for further comparison.
Keywords
More by Anna Do
View full profile →Readability and Suitability of Online Patient Education Materials for Glaucoma.
Open Conjunctival Approach for Sub-Tenon's Xen Gel Stent Placement and Bleb Morphology by Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography.
Interim Analysis of Clinical Outcomes with Open versus Closed Conjunctival Implantation of the XEN45 Gel Stent.
Top Research in IOP & Medical Therapy
Browse all →The Complications of Myopia: A Review and Meta-Analysis.
Inflammation in Glaucoma: From the back to the front of the eye, and beyond.
Treatment Outcomes in the Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study after 1 Year of Follow-up.
In the Knowledge Library
Discussion
Comments and discussion will appear here in a future update.