Demographic and Clinical Characteristics Associated with Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery Use: An Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS®) Registry Retrospective Cohort Analysis.
Mildred M G Olivier, Oluwatosin U Smith, Clarisse C Croteau-Chonka, Brian L VanderBeek, Maureen G Maguire, Flora Lum, Danielle Fujino, Scott P Kelly, William L Rich, Eydie G Miller-Ellis
Summary
This analysis highlights the importance of capturing race-ethnicity data and other pertinent patient characteristics in electronic health records to provide insight into practice patterns.
Abstract
PURPOSE
Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) is increasingly performed at the time of cataract extraction. Understanding the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients undergoing MIGS procedures may provide insight into patient selection. This study evaluates racial-ethnic and other differences in the use of MIGS in persons with cataract and open-angle glaucoma (OAG).
DESIGN
Retrospective cohort study using Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS) Registry data.
PARTICIPANTS
Patients aged ≥ 40 years with a diagnosis of OAG and no history of MIGS or cataract surgery who were undergoing cataract extraction, with or without MIGS, during 2013 to 2017 in the United States.
METHODS
Multivariable logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Variables assessed include age, sex, race-ethnicity, disease severity, insurance type, census region, comorbidity, and cup-to-disc ratio (CDR).
RESULTS
The odds of MIGS use was greater among patients who were aged ≥ 60 years (OR, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.05-1.16]); Black (OR, 1.11 [CI, 1.07-1.15]) compared with White; a Medicare recipient (OR, 1.12 [CI, 1.10-1.15]) versus privately insured; or in the Midwest (OR, 1.32 [CI, 1.28-1.36]) or Northeast (OR, 1.26 [CI, 1.22-1.30]) compared with the South. Having moderate rather than mild glaucoma (OR, 1.07 [CI, 1.04-1.11]) and a higher CDR (OR for 0.5 to 0.8 vs. 0.8 to 1.0 vs. <0.5, 1.27 [CI, 1.23-1.32]) were also each associated with increased odds of MIGS use. Use of MIGS was less likely in women (OR, 0.96 [CI, 0.94-0.98]); patients taking 5 to 7 glaucoma medications (OR, 0.94 [CI, 0.90-0.99]) compared with 1 to 2 medications; and patients with severe, compared with mild, glaucoma (OR, 0.64 [CI, 0.61-0.67]).
CONCLUSIONS
This analysis highlights the importance of capturing race-ethnicity data and other pertinent patient characteristics in electronic health records to provide insight into practice patterns. Such data can be used to assess the long-term performance of MIGS and other procedures in various patient populations.
Keywords
More by Mildred M G Olivier
View full profile →Improving Access to Eye Care: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Clinical and Economic Burden of Glaucoma by Disease Severity: A United States Claims-Based Analysis.
Glaucoma Cascade Screening in a High Risk Afro-Caribbean Haitian Population: A Pilot Study.
Top Research in Glaucoma Surgery
Browse all →Treatment Outcomes in the Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study after 1 Year of Follow-up.
Efficacy, Safety, and Risk Factors for Failure of Standalone Ab Interno Gelatin Microstent Implantation versus Standalone Trabeculectomy.
Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Pivotal Trial of an Ab Interno Implanted Trabecular Micro-Bypass in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Cataract: Two-Year Results.
Discussion
Comments and discussion will appear here in a future update.