Deep Learning Estimation of 10-2 and 24-2 Visual Field Metrics Based on Thickness Maps from Macula OCT.
Mark Christopher, Christopher Bowd, James A Proudfoot, Akram Belghith, Michael H Goldbaum, Jasmin Rezapour, Massimo A Fazio, Christopher A Girkin, Moraes Gustavo De, Jeffrey M Liebmann, Robert N Weinreb, Linda M Zangwill
Summary
Deep learning models improved estimates of functional loss from SD OCT imaging. Accurate estimates can help clinicians to individualize VF testing to patients.
Abstract
PURPOSE
To develop deep learning (DL) systems estimating visual function from macula-centered spectral-domain (SD) OCT images.
DESIGN
Evaluation of a diagnostic technology.
PARTICIPANTS
A total of 2408 10-2 visual field (VF) SD OCT pairs and 2999 24-2 VF SD OCT pairs collected from 645 healthy and glaucoma subjects (1222 eyes).
METHODS
Deep learning models were trained on thickness maps from Spectralis macula SD OCT to estimate 10-2 and 24-2 VF mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD). Individual and combined DL models were trained using thickness data from 6 layers (retinal nerve fiber layer [RNFL], ganglion cell layer [GCL], inner plexiform layer [IPL], ganglion cell-IPL [GCIPL], ganglion cell complex [GCC] and retina). Linear regression of mean layer thicknesses were used for comparison.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Deep learning models were evaluated using Rand mean absolute error (MAE) compared with 10-2 and 24-2 VF measurements.
RESULTS
Combined DL models estimating 10-2 achieved Rof 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.89) for MD and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.55-0.81) for PSD and MAEs of 1.9 dB (95% CI, 1.6-2.4 dB) for MD and 1.5 dB (95% CI, 1.2-1.9 dB) for PSD. This was significantly better than mean thickness estimates for 10-2 MD (0.61 [95% CI, 0.47-0.71] and 3.0 dB [95% CI, 2.5-3.5 dB]) and 10-2 PSD (0.46 [95% CI, 0.31-0.60] and 2.3 dB [95% CI, 1.8-2.7 dB]). Combined DL models estimating 24-2 achieved Rof 0.79 (95% CI, 0.72-0.84) for MD and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.53-0.79) for PSD and MAEs of 2.1 dB (95% CI, 1.8-2.5 dB) for MD and 1.5 dB (95% CI, 1.3-1.9 dB) for PSD. This was significantly better than mean thickness estimates for 24-2 MD (0.41 [95% CI, 0.26-0.57] and 3.4 dB [95% CI, 2.7-4.5 dB]) and 24-2 PSD (0.38 [95% CI, 0.20-0.57] and 2.4 dB [95% CI, 2.0-2.8 dB]). The GCIPL (R= 0.79) and GCC (R= 0.75) had the highest performance estimating 10-2 and 24-2 MD, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Deep learning models improved estimates of functional loss from SD OCT imaging. Accurate estimates can help clinicians to individualize VF testing to patients.
Keywords
More by Mark Christopher
View full profile →Deep Learning Approaches Predict Glaucomatous Visual Field Damage from OCT Optic Nerve Head En Face Images and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Maps.
Macular and Optic Nerve Head Vessel Density and Progressive Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Loss in Glaucoma.
Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Features Identified by Unsupervised Machine Learning on Optical Coherence Tomography Scans Predict Glaucoma Progression.
Top Research in Visual Field
Browse all →Optical coherence tomography angiography: A comprehensive review of current methods and clinical applications.
Relationship between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Vessel Density and Severity of Visual Field Loss in Glaucoma.
Improving our understanding, and detection, of glaucomatous damage: An approach based upon optical coherence tomography (OCT).
Discussion
Comments and discussion will appear here in a future update.