Am J Ophthalmol
Am J OphthalmolOctober 2021Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Hemiretinal Asymmetry in Peripapillary Vessel Density in Healthy, Glaucoma Suspect, and Glaucoma Eyes.

Optic Nerve & DiscOCT & Imaging

Summary

hdVAD is higher in early glaucoma and may help with early detection when damage is focal, but its diagnostic ability appears less robust in advanced glaucoma when damage is diffuse.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate hemiretinal asymmetry in radial peripapillary capillary vessel area density (VAD) of healthy, glaucoma suspect, and glaucoma eyes of varying severity and its diagnostic utility for glaucoma.

DESIGN

Population-based, cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Optic disc scans (6 × 6 mm) were collected on optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) to obtain VAD and on optical coherence tomography (OCT) to measure circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness. Hemiretinal difference in VAD (hdVAD) was defined as the absolute difference between superior and inferior hemiretinal VAD. Age-adjusted multivariable linear regression of hdVAD on glaucoma severity was performed. Areas under curves (AUCs) were calculated from predicted probabilities generated by multiple logistic regression of glaucoma severity on age-adjusted single and combined parameters.

RESULTS

A total of 1,043 eyes of 1,043 participants (587 healthy, 270 suspect, 67 mild, 54 moderate, 65 severe glaucoma) were included. After age adjustment, mean hdVAD was similar between healthy and suspect (P = .225), higher in mild vs suspect (P < .001), and higher in moderate vs mild (P = .018), but lower in severe vs moderate (P = .001). AUCs of hdVAD were highest for discriminating mild (0.685) and moderate (0.681) glaucoma from healthy. Combining hdVAD and global RNFL (gRNFL) yielded the highest AUCs of all parameters for mild (0.818) and any POAG (0.859) and resulted in significantly better diagnostic accuracy than either hdVAD or gRNFL alone (P < .05 for all comparisons).

CONCLUSIONS

hdVAD is higher in early glaucoma and may help with early detection when damage is focal, but its diagnostic ability appears less robust in advanced glaucoma when damage is diffuse.

In the Knowledge Library

Discussion

Comments and discussion will appear here in a future update.