Long-term Outcomes of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Under a Failed Penetrating Keratoplasty Graft.
Summary
The only significant difference between DSAEK and DMEK cohorts was rebubble rate.
Abstract
PURPOSE
To compare long-term outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) versus Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) under a failed penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) graft.
METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed consecutive surgeries (Febuary 2007-September 2023) that received a DSAEK graft (n = 52) or DMEK graft (n = 51) under a failed PKP. Postoperative complication rates of primary graft failure (PGF), late endothelial graft failure, graft rejection, rebubble, and steroid response were recorded. Endothelial cell loss (ECL) at 6-month, 2-year, and 5-year postoperative visits were calculated. Graft survival time and survival probability at 5 years was determined using a Kaplan-Meier analysis. Twelve DMEK and 17 DSAEK eyes had 5-year follow-up. Eyes with a glaucoma filtration tube, trabeculectomy, or anterior chamber intraocular lens were excluded.
RESULTS
Rebubble rate was significant between DSAEK and DMEK cohorts (5.8%, 29.4%, P = 0.0017*). Rate of rejection, late endothelial graft failure, steroid response, 6-month ECL, 2-year ECL, 5-year ECL, survival probability, and 5-year mean survival time were not significant between DSAEK and DMEK cohorts [(9.6%, 5.9%, P = 0.7155), (13.5%, 9.8%, P = 0.7602), (9.6%, 11.8%, P = 0.7602), (32.0% ± 21.0%, 41.65% ± 25.6%, P = 0.1949), (55.8% ± 21.6%, 62.5% ± 19.8%, P = 0.4463), (59.5% ± 35.0%, 72.5% ± 5.7%, P = 0.3468), (88.5%, 84.3%, P = 0.483), (53.9 ± 2.4 confidence interval, 49.1-58.6 months, 52.7 ± 2.9 confidence interval, 47.0-58.5 months)]. PGF occurred in 0/52 (0%) and 3/51 (5.9%) eyes in the DSAEK and DMEK cohorts with nonsignificant trends favoring DSAEK ( P = 0.1178).
CONCLUSIONS
The only significant difference between DSAEK and DMEK cohorts was rebubble rate. However, nonsignificant trends favored PGF and ECL in the DSAEK cohort. Further investigation is warranted to determine if DSAEK provides better short-term and similar long-term outcomes compared with DMEK under a failed PKP.
Keywords
Top Research in Glaucoma Surgery
Browse all →Treatment Outcomes in the Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study after 1 Year of Follow-up.
Efficacy, Safety, and Risk Factors for Failure of Standalone Ab Interno Gelatin Microstent Implantation versus Standalone Trabeculectomy.
Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Pivotal Trial of an Ab Interno Implanted Trabecular Micro-Bypass in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Cataract: Two-Year Results.
In the Knowledge Library
Discussion
Comments and discussion will appear here in a future update.