Comparison of Event-based Analysis Versus Trend-based Analysis in the Detection of Glaucoma Progression by Optical Coherence Tomography 3-Dimensional Rim Measurements.
Tamara D Scott, Aparicio Maria A Guzman, Kitiya Ratanawongphaibul, Hang Lee, Michele Zemplenyi, Edem Tsikata, Milica A Margeta, Courtney L Ondeck, Anne L Coleman, Fei Yu, Boer Johannes F de, Teresa C Chen
Summary
Compared with trend-based analysis, event-based analysis detected OCT structural progression in more glaucoma patients and at an earlier time point.
Abstract
PRCIS
Compared with trend-based analysis, event-based analysis detects OCT structural progression in more patients and at an earlier time point. Using event-based analysis, MDB rim thickness detects progression more often than RNFL thickness.
PURPOSE
To determine whether event-based or trend-based analysis best detects glaucoma progression using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and minimum distance band (MDB) neuroretinal rim measurements.
METHODS
Over 5 years, 124 open angle glaucoma patients had yearly dilated eye examinations, disc photography, Humphrey visual field (HVF 24-2) testing, 2-dimensional (2D) OCT RNFL thickness measurements, and 3-dimensional (3D) OCT MDB rim measurements, all on the same day. One eye of each patient was analyzed, which was randomly selected if both eyes from a patient were eligible. Using global RNFL thickness and global MDB rim thickness, event-based progression was defined as change greater than normal aging change and expected inter-test variability. Trend-based analysis used linear regression with progression defined as rate of decline greater than age-related decline.
RESULTS
The average follow-up for the 124 open angle glaucoma patients was 66.9±16.4 months. Event-based analysis was better than trend-based analysis because it detected progression in more patients (15.3% by RNFL event-based analysis versus 8.1% by RNFL trend-based analysis, P =0.025; 52.4% by MDB event-based analysis versus 9.7% by MDB trend-based analysis, P <0.001) and earlier (RNFL: mean 28.8 vs. 63.2 mo; P <0.001;
MDB
mean 30.7 vs. 56.2 mo; P <0.003) whether using MDB rim thickness or RNFL thickness. Using event-based analysis, MDB rim thickness detected progression more often than RNFL thickness (52.4% vs. 15.3%; P <0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Compared with trend-based analysis, event-based analysis detected OCT structural progression in more glaucoma patients and at an earlier time point.
Keywords
Top Research in Disease Progression
Browse all →Estimating Optical Coherence Tomography Structural Measurement Floors to Improve Detection of Progression in Advanced Glaucoma.
Progressive Macula Vessel Density Loss in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Longitudinal Study.
Detecting Structural Progression in Glaucoma with Optical Coherence Tomography.
In the Knowledge Library
Discussion
Comments and discussion will appear here in a future update.