Survey of Patient Understanding and Satisfaction in Glaucoma Filtering Surgery.
Summary
Overall, patient understanding was limited, and poor understanding negatively influenced postoperative satisfaction. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
To assess patients' understanding of glaucoma surgery and their postoperative satisfaction, to study the factors that may influence them, and to investigate correlations between these 2 determining factors.
DESIGN
A multicenter observational study.
SUBJECTS
Patients scheduled for glaucoma filtration surgery were included.
METHODS
Participants responded preoperatively to a questionnaire developed after literature review, evaluating their understanding of the surgery, and to a second questionnaire evaluating their postoperative satisfaction, between 2 and 3 months after surgery.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
The primary outcomes were the mean scores for preoperative understanding and postoperative satisfaction. The influence of demographic, clinical, and surgical factors on comprehension and satisfaction was analyzed using univariate and multivariate models.
RESULTS
In this study, 97 patients responded to the questionnaire evaluating their understanding of the surgery preoperatively. Postoperative satisfaction could be evaluated in 86 of them. The mean understanding score was 13.4 ± 5.4 (out of 25). Level of education (P < 0.01) and reading the French Society of Ophthalmology's information form on glaucoma filtering surgery (P < 0.05) were statistically correlated with a better understanding after multivariate analysis. The mean postoperative satisfaction score was 7.13 ± 3.0 (out of 10). Needling (P < 0.01) and resumption of hypotensive treatment (P < 0.001) were statistically correlated with poorer satisfaction after multivariate analysis. In addition, poorer preoperative understanding was correlated with lower postoperative satisfaction with a Pearson coefficient of 0.42 (95% confidence interval: 0.23-0.57 [P < 0.01]).
CONCLUSIONS
Overall, patient understanding was limited, and poor understanding negatively influenced postoperative satisfaction. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Keywords
Top Research in Glaucoma Surgery
Browse all →Treatment Outcomes in the Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study after 1 Year of Follow-up.
Efficacy, Safety, and Risk Factors for Failure of Standalone Ab Interno Gelatin Microstent Implantation versus Standalone Trabeculectomy.
Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Pivotal Trial of an Ab Interno Implanted Trabecular Micro-Bypass in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Cataract: Two-Year Results.
In the Knowledge Library
Discussion
Comments and discussion will appear here in a future update.