Safety and Efficacy of a Preservative-Free Bimatoprost 0.01% Ophthalmic Gel: Results From a Phase III Controlled Trial.
Eydie Miller-Ellis, James H Peace, Douglas G Day, Sherif M El-Harazi, Sylvie Nissle, David Wirta, Jason Bacharach
Summary
PF bimatoprost 0.01% ophthalmic gel was noninferior to the preserved bimatoprost 0.01% ophthalmic solution, with similar safety and tolerability over 3 months.
Abstract
PRCIS
Noninferiority on intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy was demonstrated for a preservative-free (PF) bimatoprost 0.01% ophthalmic gel compared with a preserved formulation following a 3-month treatment in patients with open angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT).
PURPOSE
To compare the safety and IOP-lowering efficacy of a preservative-free bimatoprost 0.01% ophthalmic gel (PFB 0.01% gel) with a preserved bimatoprost 0.01% ophthalmic solution (PB 0.01%) in patients with OAG or OHT.
METHODS
This prospective, phase III, multicenter, randomized, parallel group, investigator-masked, 3-month study included patients with OAG or OHT, previously treated with monotherapy, who underwent a maximum 7-week washout period. At day 1, patients were randomized to receive either PFB 0.01% gel (n=232) or PB 0.01% (n=234) dosed once daily from day 1 to day 85. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline in IOP across 9 timepoints (8 am , 10 am , and 4 pm ) at weeks 2, 6 and 12. Safety measures included adverse events (AEs) and conjunctival hyperemia.
RESULTS
Change in IOP from baseline was consistent across timepoints and was similar between treatment groups. Noninferiority of PFB 0.01% gel to PB 0.01% on IOP-lowering over a 12-week treatment period was demonstrated based on predetermined noninferiority margins [below 1.5 mm Hg at all timepoints (9/9) and below 1 mm Hg at the majority of time points (6/9)]. Tolerability and safety were comparable with fewer treatment-related ocular AEs in the PFB 0.01% gel group compared with the PB 0.01% group (28.1% vs. 34.8%, respectively), and conjunctival hyperemia at Week 2 (54.8% vs. 63.2%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
PF bimatoprost 0.01% ophthalmic gel was noninferior to the preserved bimatoprost 0.01% ophthalmic solution, with similar safety and tolerability over 3 months.
Keywords
More by Eydie Miller-Ellis
View full profile →Clinical and Economic Burden of Glaucoma by Disease Severity: A United States Claims-Based Analysis.
Family History in the Primary Open-Angle African American Glaucoma Genetics Study Cohort.
Demographic and Clinical Characteristics Associated with Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery Use: An Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS®) Registry Retrospective Cohort Analysis.
Top Research in IOP & Medical Therapy
Browse all →The Complications of Myopia: A Review and Meta-Analysis.
Inflammation in Glaucoma: From the back to the front of the eye, and beyond.
Treatment Outcomes in the Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study after 1 Year of Follow-up.
In the Knowledge Library
Discussion
Comments and discussion will appear here in a future update.