Clinical outcomes of clear lens extraction in eyes with primary angle closure.
Dada Tanuj, Rathi Anubha, Angmo Dewang, Agarwal Tushar, Vanathi Murugesan, Khokhar Sudarshan K, Vajpayee Rasik B
AI Summary
Clear lens extraction in primary angle closure eyes with high pressure post-LPI significantly lowered IOP and widened the angle, reducing medication needs.
Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the effect of clear lens extraction (CLE) on intraocular pressure (IOP) and the anterior chamber angle in primary angle closure after laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI).
Setting
Tertiary eyecare center at a university hospital, New Delhi, India.
Design
Prospective case series.
Methods
The study included eyes with primary angle closure and an IOP over 25.0 mm Hg more than 8 weeks after LPI. All eyes had CLE by phacoemulsification. Absolute success was defined as an IOP less than 18.0 mm Hg without medications at 12 months.
Results
In 44 eyes (24 women, 20 men; mean age 57.2 years ± 4.2 [SD]), the mean preoperative IOP of 27.1 ± 1.55 mm Hg decreased to 13.2 ± 1.12 mm Hg at 12 months (P < .0001). The angle opening distance at 500 μm increased from baseline values at 0 degrees (from 0.104 ± 0.015 mm to 0.31 ± 0.013 mm) and 180 degrees (from 0.202 ± 0.008 mm to 0.412 ± 0.012 mm). The trabecular iris angle also increased at 0 degrees (from 9.3 ± 3.2 degrees to 32.7 ± 5.6 degrees) and 180 degrees (from 9.12 ± 3.2 degrees to 31.7 ± 5.6 degrees) (all P < .0001). In multivariate analysis, the preoperative IOP was the strongest determinant of IOP change (R(2) = 0.69, P < .0001). Absolute success was achieved in 38 eyes (86.3%).
Conclusion
Clear lens extraction led to a significant reduction in IOP, a widening of the anterior chamber angle, and a reduced need for ocular hypotensive medications in eyes with primary angle closure and persistently raised IOP after LPI.
Financial disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts5
In 44 eyes with primary angle closure and an IOP over 25.0 mm Hg more than 8 weeks after LPI, clear lens extraction (CLE) by phacoemulsification decreased the mean preoperative IOP from 27.1 ± 1.55 mm Hg to 13.2 ± 1.12 mm Hg at 12 months (P < .0001).
In 44 eyes with primary angle closure and an IOP over 25.0 mm Hg more than 8 weeks after LPI, clear lens extraction (CLE) by phacoemulsification increased the angle opening distance at 500 μm from baseline values at 0 degrees (from 0.104 ± 0.015 mm to 0.31 ± 0.013 mm) and 180 degrees (from 0.202 ± 0.008 mm to 0.412 ± 0.012 mm) (all P < .0001).
In 44 eyes with primary angle closure and an IOP over 25.0 mm Hg more than 8 weeks after LPI, clear lens extraction (CLE) by phacoemulsification increased the trabecular iris angle at 0 degrees (from 9.3 ± 3.2 degrees to 32.7 ± 5.6 degrees) and 180 degrees (from 9.12 ± 3.2 degrees to 31.7 ± 5.6 degrees) (all P < .0001).
In a multivariate analysis of 44 eyes with primary angle closure treated with clear lens extraction, the preoperative IOP was the strongest determinant of IOP change (R(2) = 0.69, P < .0001).
Absolute success, defined as an IOP less than 18.0 mm Hg without medications at 12 months, was achieved in 38 eyes (86.3%) of 44 eyes with primary angle closure treated with clear lens extraction (CLE) by phacoemulsification.
Related Articles5
Pattern of Long-Term Intraocular Pressure Variation Following Gonioscopy-Assisted Transluminal Trabeculotomy: Two-Year Outcomes.
Cohort StudyOutcomes of Partial Versus Complete Goniotomy With or Without Phacoemulsification for Primary Open Angle Glaucoma: A Multicenter Study.
Retrospective StudyExcisional goniotomy vs trabecular microbypass stent implantation: a prospective randomized clinical trial in eyes with mild to moderate open-angle glaucoma.
Randomized Controlled TrialInfluence of Goniotomy Size on Treatment Safety and Efficacy for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Multicenter Study.
Observational StudyEffect of combined goniotomy and phacoemulsification on intraocular pressure in open-angle glaucoma patients.
Retrospective StudyIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.