Test-Retest Repeatability of Microperimetry at the Border of Deep Scotomas.
Wu Zhichao, Jung Chang J, Ayton Lauren N, Luu Chi D, Guymer Robyn H
AI Summary
Microperimetry's repeatability at deep scotoma borders was worse than in normal retina, limiting its use for detecting significant functional decline in these critical areas.
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to examine the test-retest repeatability of microperimetric sensitivity at the border of deep scotomas.
Methods
Thirty normal participants underwent two examinations, each on the Macular Integrity Assessment (MAIA) microperimeter and on the MP-1 microperimeter (four examinations in total). A customized stimulus pattern allowed microperimetric sensitivity to be measured at the border of the optic nerve head (ONH), which acted as a model for the border of a deep scotoma-and also at the macular and peripapillary region.
Results
There were no significant changes in average point-wise sensitivity (PWS) values between the two examinations for all three regions using the MAIA microperimeter (P ≥ 0.262). The PWS coefficient of repeatability (CoR) was ±12.99 dB at the border of the ONH, which was significantly larger than points in the macular and peripapillary regions (P > 0.001). A significant decrease in average PWS, using the MP-1 microperimeter at the macular and peripapillary region (P < 0.001), meant that the PWS CoR could not be determined in these regions. No significant changes in average PWS were observed at the border of the ONH (P = 0.223), and the PWS CoR was ±7.52 dB in this region.
Conclusions
Microperimetric test-retest repeatability at the border of a deep scotoma was worse than at other areas of normal retina, and this highlights the limitation of applying a single estimate of test-retest repeatability to determine whether significant functional decline has occurred at the border of a deep scotoma.
MeSH Terms
Shields Classification
Key Concepts5
Microperimetric test-retest repeatability at the border of a deep scotoma was worse than at other areas of normal retina.
The point-wise sensitivity (PWS) coefficient of repeatability (CoR) for the MAIA microperimeter was 12.99 dB at the border of the optic nerve head, which was significantly larger than points in the macular and peripapillary regions (P > 0.001) in 30 normal participants.
There were no significant changes in average point-wise sensitivity (PWS) values between two examinations for all three regions (border of optic nerve head, macular, and peripapillary) using the MAIA microperimeter (P ≥ 0.262) in 30 normal participants.
A significant decrease in average point-wise sensitivity (PWS) using the MP-1 microperimeter at the macular and peripapillary region (P < 0.001) meant that the PWS coefficient of repeatability (CoR) could not be determined in these regions in 30 normal participants.
No significant changes in average point-wise sensitivity (PWS) were observed at the border of the optic nerve head (P = 0.223) using the MP-1 microperimeter, and the PWS coefficient of repeatability (CoR) was 7.52 dB in this region in 30 normal participants.
Related Articles5
Evaluation of visual function and OCT parameters in ethambutol-induced optic neuropathy: a longitudinal study.
Cohort StudyPrimary Visual Pathway Changes in Individuals With Chronic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.
Case-Control StudyStructure-Function Associations Between Quantitative Contrast Sensitivity Function And Peripapillary Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Diabetic Retinopathy.
Cross-Sectional StudyRelating Standardized Automated Perimetry Performed With Stimulus Sizes III and V in Eyes With Field Loss Due to Glaucoma and NAION.
Observational StudyHigh-Resolution Microperimetry for Detecting Glaucomatous Damage: A Prospective Evaluation of Performance.
Prospective StudiesIs this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.