Global Search

Search articles, concepts, and chapters

Am J OphthalmolNovember 201614 citations

Comparison of Bruch's Membrane Opening Minimum Rim Width Among Those With Normal Ocular Health by Race.

Rhodes Lindsay A, Huisingh Carrie E, Quinn Adam E, McGwin Gerald, LaRussa Frank, Box Daniel, Owsley Cynthia, Girkin Christopher A


AI Summary

This study found no significant racial differences in BMO-MRW between African and European descendants with normal eyes, suggesting race-specific normative data may not be needed for glaucoma assessment.

Abstract

Purpose

To examine if racial differences in Bruch's membrane opening minimum rim width (BMO-MRW) in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) exist, specifically between people of African descent (AD) and European descent (ED) in normal ocular health.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Methods

Patients presenting for a comprehensive eye examination at retail-based primary eye clinics were enrolled based on ≥1 of the following at-risk criteria for glaucoma: AD aged ≥40 years, ED aged ≥50 years, diabetes, family history of glaucoma, and/or pre-existing diagnosis of glaucoma. Participants with normal optic nerves on examination received SDOCT of the optic nerve head (24 radial scans). Global and regional (temporal, superotemporal, inferotemporal, nasal, superonasal, and inferonasal) BMO-MRW were measured and compared by race using generalized estimating equations. Models were adjusted for age, sex, and BMO area.

Results

SDOCT scans from 269 eyes (148 participants) were included in the analysis. Mean global BMO-MRW declined as age increased. After adjusting for age, sex, and BMO area, there was not a statistically significant difference in mean global BMO-MRW by race (P = .60). Regionally, the mean BMO-MRW was lower in the crude model among AD eyes in the temporal, superotemporal, and nasal regions and higher in the inferotemporal, superonasal, and inferonasal regions. However, in the adjusted model, these differences were not statistically significant.

Conclusions

BMO-MRW was not statistically different between those of AD and ED. Race-specific normative data may not be necessary for the deployment of BMO-MRW in AD patients.


MeSH Terms

AdultAlabamaBruch MembraneCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlaucomaHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedOptic DiskRacial GroupsReference ValuesTomography, Optical Coherence

Key Concepts5

A cross-sectional study of 269 eyes (148 participants) found no statistically significant difference in mean global Bruch's membrane opening minimum rim width (BMO-MRW) between people of African descent (AD) and European descent (ED) after adjusting for age, sex, and BMO area (P = .60).

Comparative EffectivenessCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=269 eyes (148 participants)Ch5Ch10

In a cross-sectional study of 269 eyes (148 participants), after adjusting for age, sex, and BMO area, regional differences in Bruch's membrane opening minimum rim width (BMO-MRW) between people of African descent (AD) and European descent (ED) were not statistically significant.

Comparative EffectivenessCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=269 eyes (148 participants)Ch5Ch10

A cross-sectional study of 269 eyes (148 participants) suggests that race-specific normative data for Bruch's membrane opening minimum rim width (BMO-MRW) may not be necessary for people of African descent (AD).

DiagnosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=269 eyes (148 participants)Ch5Ch10

In a cross-sectional study of 269 eyes (148 participants), mean global Bruch's membrane opening minimum rim width (BMO-MRW) declined as age increased.

PrognosisCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=269 eyes (148 participants)Ch5

A cross-sectional study of 269 eyes (148 participants) found that in the crude model, mean regional Bruch's membrane opening minimum rim width (BMO-MRW) was lower among people of African descent (AD) in the temporal, superotemporal, and nasal regions, and higher in the inferotemporal, superonasal, and inferonasal regions compared to people of European descent (ED).

Comparative EffectivenessCross-sectionalCross-sectional studyn=269 eyes (148 participants)Ch5Ch10

Is this article assigned to the wrong chapter(s)? Let us know.